On 3/21/21, Israeli politician Naftali Bennett appeared on national Israeli television during the election campaign and stated “I won’t allow Yair Lapid to be prime minister, including in a rotation (agreement.)” and “I will not establish a government based on the support of Mansour Abbas from the Islamic Movement.” He signed a document affirming those words and held it up to the camera. In the first weeks of June of 2021, after the election, Bennett entered a rotation agreement with Lapid and established a government with the support of Mansour Abbas.
Tuesday, December 21, 2021
Monday, December 6, 2021
Those anti-science guys
I have some family and friends who assert that anybody who questions the Biden administration's policies on COVID is an anti-science Trump-worshiping conspiracy nut who get all their information from the Internet. How's that for some labeling and name-calling?
Let's meet some of those "anti-science" people.
Dr. Harvey Risch, MD, PhD
Professor of Epidemiology in the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Yale School of Public Health and Yale School of Medicine. Dr. Risch received his MD degree from the University of California San Diego and PhD from the University of Chicago. Dr. Risch is Associate Editor of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Editor of the International Journal of Cancer, and was for six years a Member of the Board of Editors, the American Journal of epidemiology. Dr. Risch is an author of more than 350 original peer-reviewed research publications in the medical literature and those research papers have been cited by other scientific publications more than 44,000 times. Dr. Risch has an h-index of 94.
What's the h-index you ask? It is a metric that measures the productivity and citation impact of a science scholars publications. Its developer Professor Jorge Hirsch, "suggested that, for physicists, a value for h of about 12 might be typical for advancement to tenure (associate professor) at major [US] research universities. A value of about 18 could mean a full professorship, 15–20 could mean a fellowship in the American Physical Society, and 45 or higher could mean membership in the United States National Academy of Sciences. Hirsch estimated that after 20 years a "successful scientist" would have an h-index of 20, an "outstanding scientist" would have an h-index of 40, and a "truly unique" individual would have an h-index of 60." (Wikipedia) Once again, Dr. Risch has an h-index of 94. In other words, he is a world-class scientist specializing in Epidemiology. For those who don't know, "Epidemiology is the study and analysis of the distribution, patterns and determinants of health and disease conditions in defined populations."
Here's some of what Dr. Risch has to say about COVID:
Natural immunity is needed "to combat other viruses, other strains [of coronavirus] that may be coming as well. And for longer-lasting protection, natural immunity is much longer lasting that vaxxed immunity”
"The vaccine immunity has a finite lifespan of somewhere between three and six months and it’s losing that over time, and more people are getting infected again." (Laura Ingraham Show)
“Some months ago, the CDC stopped counting breakthrough cases … the large numbers of cases in people who had been vaccinated. So, of course, those cases don’t register for the CDC’s counts....”
“What the doctors are telling me is that more than half of the new COVID cases they are treating are people who have already been vaccinated. They have estimated that 60% of the new patients they have treated are people who have been vaccinated."
MARTIN KULLDORFF, PhD
Professor, Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Professor, Medicine, Brigham And Women's Hospital
Kulldorff is a member of the scientific council for drug safety and risk management at the Food and Drug Administration, and a member of the Centers for Disease Control's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. He is author or co-author of 201 Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles.
“I don’t think children should be vaccinated for COVID. I’m a huge fan of vaccinating children for measles, for mumps, for polio, for rotavirus, and many other diseases, that’s critical. But COVID is not a huge threat to children.”
“They can be infected, just like they can get the common cold, but they’re not a big threat. They don’t die from this, except in very rare circumstances. So if you want to talk about protecting children or keeping children safe, I think we can talk about traffic accidents, for example, which they are really at some risk.
“And there are other things that we should make sure [of] to keep children safe. But COVID is not a big risk factor for children.”
“Hospitals should hire nurses & other staff with natural immunity…They are the ones who are least likely to infect the residents. [Yet] we’re doing the opposite. They’re being fired.”
“One example is from Sweden, during the first wave in the spring of 2020, which affected Sweden quite strongly,” Kulldorff said. “But Sweden decided to keep daycare and schools open for all children ages 1 to 15. And there are 1.8 million such children who got through the first wave without vaccines, of course, without masks, without any sort of distancing in schools.
“If a child was sick, they were told to stay home. But that was basically it. And you know how many of those 1.8 million children died from COVID? Zero. Only a few hospitalizations. So this is not a risky disease for children.” (EpochTV)
Kulldorff is one of the three authors, along with Sunetra Gupta and Jay Bhattacharya, of the 2020 Great Barrington Declaration, which advocated letting COVID-19 spread in lower-risk groups to promote herd immunity while advocating "focused protection" of older, high-risk groups.[7][8] The World Health Organization (WHO) and many other academic and public-health bodies said the declaration's strategy lacked a sound scientific basis,[9][10] and warned that it could cause many unnecessary deaths and could result in recurrent epidemics.[11][12] (Wikipedia)
Kulldorff has opposed lockdowns, contact tracing and mask mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic, and has appeared at media events to support the Great Barrington Declaration.[13][14][15][16][17][18] He has spoken out against COVID-19 vaccine passports,[19] but supports COVID-19 vaccinations.[20] In 2021, Kulldorff questioned the strategy of vaccinating younger people, citing scarcity of vaccines to more vunerable older people in developing countries.[20]" (Wikipedia)
Dr. Scott W. Atlas, MD.
Senior fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution. MD from University of Chicago. From 1998 to 2012 he was a professor and chief of neuroradiology at the Stanford University Medical Center. Dr. Atlas is also the editor of the leading textbook in the field, the best‐selling Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain and Spine, now in its 5th edition and officially translated from English into Mandarin, Spanish, and Portuguese.
It never rains in Medinas Yisroel?
Got on board a westbound 747
Oh, that talk of opportunities, TV breaks and movies
Rang true, sure rang true
Seems I've often heard that kind of talk before
It never rains in California
But girl, don't they warn ya?
It pours, man, it pours
Out of self respect, I'm out of bread
I'm underloved, I'm underfed
I wanna go home
But girl, don't they warn ya?
It pours, man, it pours
Had offers but don't know which one to take
Please don't tell 'em how you found me
Don't tell 'em how you found me
Gimme a break, give me a break
Seems I've often heard that kind of talk before
It never rains in California
But girl, don't they warn ya?
It pours, man, it pours
Thursday, December 2, 2021
Doctors and Scientists opposing COVID shot
Dr Bruce Boros
Dr Christopher Rake
Dr James Nellenschwander
Dr Judy Wilyman
Dr Michael McConville
Dr Nour De San
Dr Peter Gotzche
Dr Rheiner Fuellmich
Dr Shankara Chetty
Dr Stella Immanuel
Dr, Carolyn Bosack
Dr, Stevn Kirsch
Dr. Afzal Niaz
Dr. Alexandra Shustina
Dr. Amandha Vollmer
Dr. Amir Shahar
Dr. Andreas Noack
Dr. Andrew Kaufman
Dr. Andrew Moulden
Dr. Andrew Wakefield
Dr. Anne Fierlafijin
Dr. Anne McCloskey
Dr. Anne Mcclosky
Dr. Annie Bukacek
Dr. Ariyana Love
Dr. Aseem Malhotra
Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger
Dr. Ben Carson
Dr. Ben Edwards
Dr. Ben Tapper
Dr. Boyd Hailey
Dr. Brian Hooker
Dr. Bruce Patterson
Dr. Bryan Ardis
Dr. Bryan Tyson
Dr. Byram W. Bridle
Dr. Carrie Madej
Dr. Charles Hoffe
Dr. Chris Milburn
Dr. Chris Shaw
Dr. Christiana Parks
Dr. Christiane Northrop
Dr. Dan Erickson
Dr. Dan Stock
Dr. Daniel Cullum
Dr. Daniel Griffin
Dr. Daniel Nagase
Dr. Darell Wolfe
Dr. David Ayoub
Dr. David Brownstein
Dr. David Davis
Dr. David Martin
Dr. Eddy Bettermann MD
Dr. Elizabeth Eads
Dr. Elizabeth Evans
Dr. Franc Zalewski
Dr. Francis Christian
Dr. Frank Engley
Dr. Gert Vandeen Bossche
Dr. Ghislaine Lanctot
Dr. Gina Gold
Dr. Guido Hofmann
Dr. Harold Butram
Dr. Harvey Risch
Dr. Heather Gessling
Dr. Heiko Shoning
Dr. Henry Ealy
Dr. Hervé Seligmann
Dr. Hilde de Smet
Dr. Ivette Lozano
Dr. Jack Wolfson
Dr. James Grundvig
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler
Dr. James Todaro
Dr. Jane Orient
Dr. Jane Ruby
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
Dr. Jayne Donegan
Dr. Jeff Barke
Dr. Jessica Rose
Dr. Jim Meehan
Dr. Joe Lapado
Dr. Joel Hirschhorn
Dr. Johan Denis
Dr. John Carpay
Dr. John Littell
Dr. John Witcher
Dr. Joseph Mercola
Dr. Judy Mitkovitz
Dr. Julie Ponesse
Dr. Kelly Brogan
Dr. Ken Stoller
Dr. Kerry Mullis
Dr. Kevin Corbett
Dr. Kevin Stillwagon
Dr. Kurt Malholm
Dr. Kurt Malhom
Dr. Larry Palevsky
Dr. Lee Merritt
Dr. Lorraine Day
Dr. Luc Montainger
Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic
Dr. Luis Miguel de Benito
Dr. Manuel Alonso
Dr. Mark Brody
Dr. Mark Mcdonald
Dr. Mark Trozzi
Dr. Mary Tally Bowden
Dr. May Ann Block
Dr. Mayer Eiesenstien
Dr. Meryl Nass
Dr. Michael Elice
Dr. Michael Lake
Dr. Michael Mcdowell
Dr. Michael Palmer
Dr. Michael Yeadon
Dr. Mobeen Syed
Dr. Mohammed Adil
Dr. Nancy Burks
Dr. Natalia Prego Cancelo
Dr. Nathan Thompson
Dr. Nicole Delepine
Dr. Pamela Popper
Dr. Pascal Sacre
Dr. Patricia Lee
Dr. Patrick Phillips
Dr. Paul Cottrell
Dr. Paul Thomas
Dr. Peter Doshi
Dr. Peter Mcullough
Dr. Peter Schirmacher
Dr. Peterson Pierre
Dr. Phillip Incao
Dr. Phillip McMillan
Dr. Pierre Gilbert
Dr. Pierre Kory
Dr. Pior Rubis
Dr. R. Zac Cox
Dr. Ralph ER Sundberg
Dr. Randi Juanta
Dr. Rashid A.Buttar
Dr. Ray Page
Dr. Raymond Obamsawin
Dr. RC Tent
Dr. Rebecca Carley
Dr. Richard Bartlett
Dr. Richard Deth
Dr. Richard Flemming
Dr. Richard Moskowitz
Dr. Richard Urso
Dr. Rima Laibow
Dr. Robert Malone
Dr. Robert Mendelson
Dr. Robert Rowen
Dr. Robert Young
Dr. Roby Mitchell
Dr. Rochagné Kilian
Dr. Rochagne Killian
Dr. Roger Hodkison
Dr. Russel Blaylock
Dr. Ryan Cole
Dr. Sam Duby
Dr. Sam Eggertsen
Dr. Sam Sigoloff
Dr. Scott Jensen
Dr. Scott Youngblood
Dr. Sean Brooks
Dr. Sherry TennPenny
Dr. Shiv Chopra
Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai
Dr. Simone Gold
Dr. Stephanie Seneff
Dr. Steven Gundry
Dr. Steven Hotze
Dr. Steven LaTulippe
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi
Dr. Susan McCreadie
Dr. Suzanne Humphries
Dr. Terry Wahls
Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych
Dr. Theresa Long
Dr. Theressa Deisher
Dr. Thomas Ynges
Dr. Tori Bark
Dr. Troy Ross
Dr. Vanessa Passov
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko
Dr. Yoav Yehezkelli
Dr. Zandra Botha
Prof. Retsif Levi
Thursday, November 25, 2021
The totalitarian path
The totalitarian regimes responsible for the most heinous atrocities in the 20th century – think Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Pol Pot – they didn’t get there overnight.
They used fear to control. They excluded the ‘dirty’ people, softly at first. They justified the exclusion. They moved to harder exclusions and eventually eliminated people either socially, or physically.
In 21st century, Australia state premiers are racing down that familiar path trying to out-tyrant each other, drunk on power, setting up their own biosecurity police states complete with medical apartheid.
Sadly, we’ve enabled it refusing to rein them in – worse, supplying the Australian immunization register data that underpins this medical apartheid.
Fear is the justification of choice for coercion and control with non-vaccinated Australians increasingly demonized, ostracized and socially eradicated.
In Queensland, the premier tweeted that people not vaccinated raised red flags – Not just one, but 22 of them.
The media politicians and health bureaucrats all claim Covid-19 is now a pandemic of the unvaccinated, but there is no justification for such demonization.
In a German study, 55 percent of symptomatic patients over 60 were fully vaccinated. Gibraltar, where all 34,000 residents are fully vaccinated, is recording 60 new cases a day.
The totalitarian path, the path that we are unquestionably on, has never ended well.
The solution is a rediscovery of human dignity, along with – and I don’t say this lightly – civil disobedience.
Australian Queensland MP George Robert Christensen, Nov. 24, 2021 before Australian Parliament
Wednesday, November 24, 2021
The Partridge Family's "I Think I Love You" is a terrible song.
The Partridge Family's "I Think I Love You" is a terrible song. It's a monotone monologue. There's almost no melody. That it became a worldwide sensation is a testimony to the incredible singing of David Cassidy. This was our first exposure to him and we all went crazy for it, despite the song.
David had a smooth voice that was loaded with personality. It had the quality of making you feel that he was in the room with you. And he could sing powerfully and do it on the dime. It was like a car going 0 to 60 in 4 seconds. His timing was impeccable. Being a musician and gifted comedic actor played a role there. Each one of his artistic gifts aided the other. He was one of a kind, one of the best pop singers ever.
Sunday, November 7, 2021
demoralization
“As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore,” said Bezmenov. “A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures; even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him [a] concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it, until he [receives] a kick in his fan-bottom. When a military boot crashes his balls then he will understand. But not before that. That’s the [tragedy] of the situation of demoralization.”
–Yuri Bezmenov [1983]
Thursday, November 4, 2021
funeral director
Before the covid shot, they marked everything as covid based on a test. cancer deaths, whatever, they made them covid. now with the shot many more are dropping dead but they don't mark them as covid. but they mostly are blood/heart clotting deaths, and many miscarriages.
Wednesday, November 3, 2021
the ignorance of the masses
Rav Avigdor Miller on Learning From Voting Mistakes
Q:
What can we learned from the election of Elizabeth Holtzman (Democrat, House of Representatives and then District Attorney of Kings County, Brooklyn)?
A:
We can learn a great deal. We can learn that the public is not aware of the necessity of protecting their interests. I won't go into that now; next time when there is an election we have to talk about it more. But it is important for the Orthodox public to wake up – the other public are beheimos; we can't talk about them because they don’t understand the issues at all; they read the newspapers, they listen to the radio, and they are prisoners of television and they swallow all the propaganda that is fed to them. And if a Democrat party chairman tells them to vote straight Democrat, so that is what they do and therefore they elect somebody who is harmful for their interests. And many of the benefits to the public that could have been gained by means of a different candidate go lost.
People who want to protect their interests, have to take action; and it is already a little late in the season – the Orthodox Jews have to wake up and realize they have to vote not for what somebody promises to give them some benefit, some handout, some small program or some privilege; they have to vote for the overall benefits to the general public because what the public benefits from, the Orthodox Jew is also going to benefit. It is very important to be aware of the issues and if you yourself are not fully competent, then you should consult the Torah leaders who know what is what.
TAPE # 385
Thursday, October 28, 2021
The Beatles were not great songwriters
Whenever you see lists of the best songwriters, Lennon-McCartney are near the top of the list, if not the top. But, here's one for ya. The Beatles were not great songwriters, certainly not great lyricists. Why do they get deemed as such? I think their whole production appealed to people, the combination of writing, singing, and production. Lennon and McCartney were great singers. And they were innovative in the way they put everything together. But if you dig into the songs, things are not so magical. It's like Wayne Gretsky or Tom Brady. Not the fastest, strongest, or most agile, but very smart about the game.
Here we go. Let's start with their first hit.
Love, love me do
You know I love you
I'll always be true
So please, love me do
Whoa, love me do
OK now, moving on. How about this one?
Oh yeah, I'll tell you something
I think you'll understand
When I say that something
I wanna hold your hand
I wanna hold your hand
I wanna hold your hand
And then there's:
She loves you, yeah, yeah, yeah
She loves you, yeah, yeah, yeah
She loves you, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah
You think you lost your love
Well, I saw her yesterday
It's you she's thinking of
And she told me what to say
She says she loves you
And you know that can't be bad
Yes, she loves you
And you know you should be glad
There is no poetry in these lyrics, other than maybe the line “When I say that something.” Yes, the words rhyme, but that's not all there is to poetry. Poetry is word play that makes your heart tingle. It's different than spoken speech. Poetry uses metaphor, symbolism, and unusual imagery to evoke meaning and feeling that goes beyond prosaic speech.
Here's an example of poetry found in rock music, written by Jagger and Richards of the Rolling Stones.
I see a red door and I want it painted black
No colours anymore, I want them to turn black
I see the girls walk by, dressed in their summer clothes
I have to turn my head until my darkness goes
Now that is cool. First you have the image of a red door, not something one sees every day, and a guy who expresses his anger and negativity by wanting it painted black. He wants all colors painted black. That is not prosaic speech. He doesn't just say, “I am angry.” He portrays that with imagery. He evokes a meaning with wonderful word economy. He is angry. He is bitter. Why is his so bitter? The next line gives us a clue. Seeing the sexy ladies in their summer clothes frustrates him sexually. This is conveyed as darkness that fills his head. Darkness is black. He wants everything painted that way. That is four powerful lines of poetry that expresses what maybe most men have felt at some point in their lives, if not every day.
Paint It Black was released in May, 1966 and Love Me Do in 1962, so maybe it's only fair to look at some of the Beatles later work as they were kids who were maturing rapidly. The Revolver Album came out in 1966. The most famous songs on that record are arguably Good Day Sunshine, Eleanor Rigby, Got to Get You into My Life, She Said She Said, Yellow Submarine, and Here, There and Everywhere. Let's look at those.
I need to laugh, and when the sun is out
I've got something I can laugh about
I feel good, in a special way
I'm in love and it's a sunny day
Good day sunshine
Good day sunshine
Good day sunshine
We take a walk, the sun is shining down
Burns my feet as they touch the ground
The last line has a touch of poetic imagery but it's simple observation. It has no bearing on the song. It's an empty song about the wonderful feeling of being in love, a McCartney theme. Silly Love Songs. Here's another one:
I was alone, I took a ride
I didn't know what I would find there
Another road where maybe I could see another kind of mind there
Ooh, then I suddenly see you
Ooh, did I tell you I need you
Every single day of my life
You didn't run, you didn't lie
You knew I wanted just to hold you
And had you gone you knew in time we'd meet again
For I had told you
Ooh, you were meant to be near me
Ooh, and I want you to hear me
Say we'll be together every day
Got to get you into my life
Even though romantic fantasies lead most people to heartache, with McCartney it's all so lovely. This lyric is pretty empty; although the first line ain't bad. I was alone and took a ride to find another kind of mind. That's imagery. We don't normally think of ourselves as looking for other kinds of minds. There is evocative imagery in the first lines.
The whole production is very catchy, with the horns and all. And that's true of many Beatle songs. Take Yellow Submarine:
In the town where I was born
Lived a man who sailed to sea
And he told us of his life
In the land of submarines
So we sailed up to the sun
'Til we found the sea of green
And we lived beneath the waves
In our yellow submarine
We all live in a yellow submarine
Yellow submarine, yellow submarine
We all live in a yellow submarine
Yellow submarine, yellow submarine
What does any of that mean? It's a silly children's song. The idea that we all live in a Yellow Submarine is intriguing at first. But after thinking about it for 50 years, one realizes it means nothing.
Lennon called Here, There, and Everywhere one of his favorite Beatle songs. Yes, it's sung sweetly with soothing harmonies, and the rhyme in the title is intriguing. But what follows?
To lead a better life I need my love to be here...
Here, making each day of the year
Changing my life with the wave of her hand
Nobody can deny that there's something there
There, running my hands through her hair
Both of us thinking how good it can be
Someone is speaking but she doesn't know he's there
I want her everywhere and if she's beside me
I know I need never care
But to love her is to need her everywhere
Knowing that love is to share
The line “Changing my life with the wave of her hand” is poetic but pablum. Once again, it's a silly love song. It's not profound, it's not wise. It's love drug.
Compare to this gem from the Stones, written in 1962:
It is the evening of the day
I sit and watch the children play
Smiling faces I can see
But not for me
I sit and watch
As tears go by
My riches can't buy everything
I want to hear the children sing
All I hear is the sound
Of rain falling on the ground
I sit and watch
As tears go by
It is the evening of the day
I sit and watch the children play
Doin' things I used to do
They think are new
I sit and watch
As tears go by
Once again, great word economy from the Stones. And so evocative. It's evening, when loneliness hurts the most. The singer sees smiling faces, but they are not smiling for him. They are the smiles of strangers who smile at each other. He is left out. I watch as tears go by. What is that? Is the happiness of these strangers tears for him as they are reminders of his loneliness? I'll go with that. It's a mysterious line but it packs a bunch. It's not nonsensical as are so many Beatles lines, particularly those from Lennon.
She said, "I know what it's like to be dead.
I know what it is to be sad."
And she's making me feel like I've never been born
I said, "Who put all those things in your head?
Things that make me feel that I'm mad.
And you're making me feel like I've never been born."
She said, "You don't understand what I said."
I said, "No, no, no, you're wrong.
When I was a boy everything was right,
Everything was right."
I said, "Even though you know what you know,
I know that I'm ready to leave
'Cause you're making me feel like I've never been born."
She said, "You don't understand what I said."
I said, "No, no, no, you're wrong.
When I was a boy everything was right,
Everything was right."
There's so much wrong with that lyric. For one, it is a jumble of nothing. What is this song about? But worse, it's so wordy. Lots of Lennon songs are like that.
Take A Day in the Life. This is arguably the most powerful song from the album always credited as the best of all time in rock.
I read the news today, oh boy
About a lucky man who made the grade
And though the news was rather sad
Well, I just had to laugh
I saw the photograph
He blew his mind out in a car;
He didn't notice that the lights had changed
A crowd of people stood and stared
They'd seen his face before
Nobody was really sure if he was from the House of Lords
I saw a film today, oh boy;
The English army had just won the war
A crowd of people turned away
But I just had to look
Having read the book
I'd love to turn you on
What are reading his journal? Did he put the slightest effort into crafting those words? I guess it's a song about the dark side of fame, but it doesn't teach us anything we didn't know. And most of it makes no sense. “He blew his mind out in a car; He didn't notice that the lights had changed.” That seems profound, but one realizes after thinking it over for half a century that it's random thought. It doesn't mean anything. Lennon admits that the lyrics are based on newspaper headlines. He's a guy at a coffee table reading headlines to us. That is not poetry. And so as not to pile on the abuse, I'm not even getting into the middle part from McCartney about sitting on a bus and dragging a comb across the head.
Still it's a powerful song. Why? Well the singing is top notch. Lennon owed one of the best pop voices ever. And the whole production with the piano that takes off like an airplane and the orchestral finale is titillating to the ears. This is an example of the Beatle magic. The lyrics are weak, but the whole thing works. They were innovative sound makers. But they are shallow.
Here's another one:
Let me take you down
'Cause I'm going to strawberry fields
Nothing is real and nothing to get hung about
Strawberry fields forever
Living is easy with eyes closed
Misunderstanding all you see
It's getting hard to be someone but it all works out
It doesn't matter much to me
Let me take you down
'Cause I'm going to strawberry fields
Nothing is real and nothing to get hung about
Strawberry fields forever
No one I think is in my tree
I mean it must be high or low
That is you can't, you know tune in but it's all right
That is I think it's not too bad
Just random lines, cliches, nonsense. What do strawberries have to do with any of this? It's just imagery. Penny Lane is another song like that. Just images. They're OK. It's a catchy tune. Barbershops and little kids laughing and a man who wears a mack in the pouring rain, a nostalgic memory of a childhood and warm feelings for a neighborhood. It's saccharine. It's not a crime to make such a song, but it's not genius profundity.
Compare to:
You can't always get what you want
But if you try sometime you find
You get what you need
That's wisdom. That's the Stones again, you know the guys who were just a blues cover band according to McCartney. Much of the rest of the lyric gets a bit cryptic, like an attempt to copy the Lennon I am the Walrus style random imagery. Jagger seemed to have a weird insecurity with regard to the Beatles, and that is a shame because in my view he is far more talented. But hard as he may have tried to imitate Lennon, the song still makes sense. It's all about people who don't get what they want.
I saw her today at the reception
A glass of wine in her hand
I knew she would meet her connection
At her feet was a footloose man
It's not clear at first what the footloose (free from ties) man has to do with anything, but the stanza seems to be about a woman who wants one man and is getting another. The latter sits at her feet. He's footloose. Not marriage material for sure. So upon second thought, the footloose man does fit into all this. And we didn't have to wait 50 years to figure it out. Again, great word economy and great imagery, all of which ties into the theme. It should be no surprise that Jagger attended the London School of Economics. For a guy who Don McClean depicted as Jack Flash and the devil, he was damn smart.
You want word economy. Try this:
I can't get no satisfaction
I can't get no girl reaction
'Cause I try and I try and I try and I try
I can't get no, I can't get no
Sexual frustration again conveyed in a few lines. After a few bars, “I can't get no” sums it all up.
The Beatles have their moments. “Well, she was just seventeen. You know what I mean.” Is good. This is good: “And anytime you feel the pain, Hey, Jude, refrain. Don't carry the world upon your shoulders. For well you know that it's a fool Who plays it cool By making his world a little colder.”
There's wisdom there and compassion. Hey Jude is quite good. Eleanor Rigby is another one from McCartney that qualifies as strong writing. Then there's Blackbird.
Blackbird singing in the dead of night
Take these broken wings and learn to fly
All your life
You were only waiting for this moment to arise
As usual with McCartney, it's all so simple. He lives in a simple world. But the song is encouraging. It has lifted me up at times like an affirmation. There's symbolism, effective imagery.
Yesterday is darker, not that a song has to be dark to be good.
Yesterday all my troubles seemed so far away.
Now it looks as though they're here to stay.
Oh, I believe in yesterday.
Suddenly, I'm not half the man I used to be.
There's a shadow hanging over me.
Oh, yesterday came suddenly.
Believing in yesterday. That's no prosaic speech. It's an unhealthy sentiment, but it's something people do. That's good song writing.
McCartney wasn't bad. But wasn't a genius lyricist. Unfortunately, he's called that so often that he actually published a book of his lyrics as a poetry book. So you saw Blackberry, which is a good lyric, presented as poetry, which it really isn't.
Lennon was a disturbed man and his songs show it.
I am he
As you are he
As you are me
And we are all together
See how they run
Like pigs from a gun
See how they fly
I'm crying
Sitting on a cornflake
Waiting for the van to come
Corporation tee shirt
Stupid bloody Tuesday
Man, you been a naughty boy
You let your face grow long
Means nothing, just a collection of weird imagery. And that's fine. The whole song grabs you, but again that's not because of the lyric. It's singing, creative noise making, and production.
Compare to the Stones again:
Angie, Angie
When will those clouds all disappear?
Angie, Angie
Where will it lead us from here?
With no loving in our souls
And no money in our coats
You can't say we're satisfied
But Angie, Angie
You can't say we never tried
Angie, you're beautiful, yeah
But ain't it time we said goodbye?
The lyric is pure heartache in part because it's so confusing. He loves Angie. Her kisses still taste sweet. She's beautiful. She cries for him. So why should they say goodbye? Is it because there's no money in their coats? Lots of lovers with no money have stayed together. The clouds won't disappear, but that's vague. What specifically is the problem? Is it because there no loving in their souls? Are they incapable of love? That is a tragedy. There's pathos here. It's powerful. And the singing and production are as good as anything the Beatles ever did.
So there's some of it. And I only compared to the Stones, didn't bring in Dylan, Springsteen, Neil Young, Joni Mitchell, Goffin and other great lyricists. I don't count the Beatles among them. And if you are not a great lyricist, you are not a great song writer. At least pair up with one as Elton John and Carole King did.
demoralize
It takes from fifteen to twenty years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy. Exposed to the ideology of the enemy. In other words, Marxism–Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least three generations of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism, American patriotism. The result, the result you can see. Most of the people who graduated in the ’60s, drop-outs or half-baked intellectuals, are now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass media, educational system. You are stuck with them. You cannot get rid of them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern. You cannot change their minds. Even if you expose them to authentic information, even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still cannot change the basic perception and the logic of behavior. In other words, these people — the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible. To rid society of these people you need another twenty or fifteen years to educate a new generation of patriotically-minded, commonsense people who would be acting in favor and in the interests of the United States society.
Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov
Wednesday, October 6, 2021
Rabbonim: Do not pressure the Klal to take a potentialy dangerous vaccine
Rumble — Counter to what is being told - many Rabbonim are against taking this vaccine based on its current safety profile.
The climate of pressure and intimidation must stop and we must stand in defense of those who choose not to take it.
Thursday, September 30, 2021
Address of Rav Yosef Zalman Bloch shlita,
Address of Rav Yosef Zalman Bloch shlita, [son of Rosh Yeshivas Telshe Hagaon Rav Elya Meir zt”l] Rav of Lakewood Minyan [Monsey] and Rosh Kollel Eitz Chaim
Let me begin by saying that I am far from being an anti-vaxer. In fact all my children B”H have all the vaccines. In fact, my policy for mosdos that asked me has been, that they are entitled to insist that children be vaccinated in all of the old-fashioned vaccines. So my position is not anti-vax. I am now speaking specifically about the new COVID so-called vaccine. Let me begin by saying the following; I don’t really need to add to the discussion. Anybody who will study the subject intensely, who will do his own research, will see the truth, and will have such a pachad that there will be no discussion necessary. Sy [both] mi’tzad the mitzius, it’s horrendous and frightening what’s happening right now, and also what ch”v could happen in the next few years.
Benefit vs. Risk
The benefits of the vaccine are mamash a joke. Baruch Hashem without the vaccine things were fine. The entire matzav had subsided and everything was on a good matzav. For people below age seventy they said the recovery rate was over 99.5 [for young people it was 99.997], and there was very little sakanah. All of a sudden now they are pushing the vaccine, not stam, I don’t remember in my lifetime such a huge push of propaganda non-stop to get people to take it. That itself should show you something is fishy, something’s wrong here. And they’re pushing it even on children. One of the biggest chasdei Hashem was that children were completely absent from the picture. Baruch Hashem children didn’t get it. Now they want to push the COVID vaccine on children. Why?
Fake News
Now as I’ve said there is nothing to talk about, it’s not necessary to discuss this; if you do your research you’ll find the truth yourself. The problem is that the frumme oilam gets the newspapers, and they see a report from Associated Press, CNBC, Reuters, CBS, and they think they have the information. However, all the frumme newspapers get their information from the mainstream media. So they’re just regurgitating all of the shkarim that are coming from all of the goyishe sources, without any kind of information about the truth, or what’s really happening. Now, the frumme oilam doesn’t realize the amount of propaganda that’s being hoisted on the world. There is immense pressure now being employed to convince people to take this so-called vaccine. And people are unaware of the truth. Now of course, many people have a vested interest in pushing it, and there are many temimim that haven’t learned to mistrust the sheker, and they feel that if you’re against this vaccine you must be a prehistoric creature that doesn’t understand what’s going-on in the world, and you don’t understand the necessity for a vaccine. But that’s not the truth.
Real News
What’s happening is that in Eretz Yisroel they are having hospital admissions of hundreds of people a day. The doctors say they can’t talk, if they open their mouth the government will take away their license, or worse. There is a terrible milchamah going on; they want to push this vaccine. The dangers are o’yom v’norah. I’ll give you another hochachah how much sheker is going on. There are two 100% safe medications that help with corona, baduk u’menusah. One of them is Hydroxy-chloroquine, the other one is Ivermectin. The government has fought bitterly to prevent them from being used. They were previously easily accessible medications. Today it’s difficult to get them, because the doctors are afraid to prescribe them. Why? Because they cure corona. Why did they take away the medicines? The answer is that they wanted to push the vaccine. So this is not some conspiracy theory, it’s a metzius. You can see with your eyes what’s happening. Doctors who have spoken up have lost their practices, and they’re being rodef any doctor who wants to speak out about his experience. A doctor puts a short video online telling people to watch out because of his own experience, and it’s taken down within ten minutes. There’s a huge milchamah going on.
Aaay the Doctor
The problem is that the frumme oilam used to be the savviest, smart, on-the-ball oilam in everything that’s going on in the world. Our oilam, the chareidim, were ahead of everyone else in understanding what’s going on. Now the frumme oilam has become mamash tipshim, they don’t know what’s going on in the world. Their family doctor tells them to take this vaccine, and they take the vaccine. They don’t understand; your family doctor has no ne’emanus on this topic. A doctor called me and asked me; ‘Why are you telling people not to take the vaccine’ I said, ‘Because it’s poison’. He said; ‘Don’t you understand, they made a big chiddush over here.’ I told the doctor; ‘A chiddush, you’re telling me a positive point? You’re going to inject millions of people with a chiddush?!’ I told this doctor; ‘I want to tell you something Doctor; I‘m not calling you a liar, but every single person you’re relying on, all the way up the chain, including Dr Fauci, are lying. They’re all lying. And you’re telling people to take the vaccine?! What are you afraid of that you have to tell people to take the vaccine, of losing your license?’
K’chomer B’yad Ha’yotzer
The most prestigious medical magazines in the world, The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine, were the most reliable peer reviewed medical journals. They printed articles that were total garbage and lies against Hydroxy-chloroquine. For the first time in history, The Lancet had to retract a previously printed article, ah shandeh v’charpah. Why did they print it? They printed it as part of the propaganda. Now this is the point; it is not necessary for me to convince you, if you do your research you’ll be convinced long before you’re finished. You’ll be horrified long before you’re finished. The only thing I have to tell you is; DO YOUR RESEARCH! Don’t let someone inject you, your father, and your children with some kind of a stuff that you don’t know anything about. Your family doctor has no ne’emanus anymore. You have to do the research yourself. With this so-called vaccine, zul der Eibishter upheeten, there are some people die as soon as they get it. Some people die two weeks later. If they die two weeks later, right away the story is; ‘Oh, who said it was from the vaccine. It’s normal for a twelve year old child to die two weeks later. It’s normal for a forty year old person to die a few weeks later. Who said it has to do with the vaccine.’ Olam hafuch! By COVID if someone died six months later from a traffic accident, it was because of COVID. But if someone got the vaccine and lasted fifteen minutes before he keeled over, they say; ‘Who said it was from the vaccine, maybe it was something else.’ Sheker, sheker, sheker, sheker, sheker.
A Well-Grounded Decision?
People tell me; I have to take the vaccine because I want to go to Eretz Yisroel. Are you crazy? Is it worth taking a chance with your life to go to Eretz Yisroel? Again; this is not a vaccine, this stuff is terrible, terrible, terrible. What it’s doing to people is o’yom v’norah. And what scares me the most is that there are serious chashashos that some people may not be able to have children after taking this vaccine. It’s nogeiyah right now; women are having very weird, weird kinds of problems that have never been experienced before. Shomer nafshoh yirchak mei’hem. Do not go near this vaccine. Be very, very careful. It’s absolutely forbidden to take this vaccine, assur b’hechlet. Do your research, and you’ll see I’m right. Hashem yishmireinu and the Eibishter should quickly send a refuah shleimah to all the cholei amo Yisroel.
Thursday, September 23, 2021
It was a total pretext!
“We went to war against a guy who had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. It was a total pretext! It’s inexplicable and there you go to Cheney, there you go to Bush, there you go to the Jewish neo-cons who wanted to remake the world. Maybe I can say that because I’m Jewish ...” Carl Bernstein
Thursday, September 16, 2021
police are watching
Police in Israel boarded an inter-city bus that was riding down a country road and handed out tickets to people they said weren't wearing masks. When they approached a boy who was wearing a mask, they told him they saw him on camera earlier not wearing the mask. In other words, police have access to the camera in the front of the bus that we always assumed was for our protection. (In case there's some violent incident on the bus.) Welcome to 1984. Welcome to the Police State.
Wednesday, September 15, 2021
wife was slowly murdered at the hospital
The recording of last night's episode is available at https://rumble.com/vmgplt-r-and-b-medical-war-crimes-8-scott-mantel.html. It was also posted on America's Frontline Doctors here.
The husband of Deborah Bucko shares the heart-wrenching story of how his wife was slowly murdered at the hospital. Aaron Glatt and the rest of the administration did everything possible to deny her Ivermectin, in defiance of all reason and the positive results before their eyes.
Read more about it at https://chananyaweissman.com/article.php?id=350
Monday, September 13, 2021
Letter from international expert on vaccines and vaccine developer against the COVID shot
Open Letter to the WHO: Immediately Halt All Covid-19 Mass Vaccinations
Geert Vanden Bossche, DMV, PhD, independent virologist and vaccine expert, formerly employed at GAVI and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
To all authorities, scientists and experts around the world, to whom this concerns: the entire world population.
I am all but an antivaxxer. As a scientist I do not usually appeal to any platform of this kind to make a stand on vaccine-related topics. As a dedicated virologist and vaccine expert I only make an exception when health authorities allow vaccines to be administered in ways that threaten public health, most certainly when scientific evidence is being ignored.
The present extremely critical situation forces me to spread this emergency call. As the unprecedented extent of human intervention in the Covid-19pandemic is now at risk of resulting in a global catastrophe without equal, this call cannot sound loudly and strongly enough.
As stated, I am not against vaccination. On the contrary, I can assure you that each of the current vaccines have been designed, developed and manufactured by brilliant and competent scientists. However, this type of prophylactic vaccines are completely inappropriate, and even highly dangerous, when used in mass vaccination campaigns during a viral pandemic.
Vaccinologists, scientists and clinicians are blinded by the positive short-term effects in individual patents, but don’t seem to bother about the disastrous consequences for global health. Unless I am scientifically proven wrong, it is difficult to understand how current human interventions will prevent circulating variants from turning into a wild monster.
Racing against the clock, I am completing my scientific manuscript, the publication of which is, unfortunately, likely to come too late given the ever increasing threat from rapidly spreading, highly infectious variants. This is why I decided to already post a summary of my findings as well as my keynote speech at the recent Vaccine Summit in Ohio on LinkedIn.
Last Monday, I provided international health organizations, including the WHO, with my analysis of the current pandemic as based on scientifically informed insights in the immune biology of Covid-19. Given the level of emergency, I urged them to consider my concerns and to initiate a debate on the detrimental consequences of further ‘viral immune escape’.
For those who are no experts in this field, I am attaching below a more accessible and comprehensible version of the science behind this insidious phenomenon.
While there is no time to spare, I have not received any feedback thus far. Experts and politicians have remained silent while obviously still eager to talk about relaxing infection prevention rules and ‘springtime freedom’. My statements are based on nothing else but science. They shall only be contradicted by science.
While one can barely make any incorrect scientific statements without being criticized by peers, it seems like the elite of scientists who are currently advising our world leaders prefer to stay silent. Sufficient scientific evidence has been brought to the table.
Unfortunately, it remains untouched by those who have the power to act. How long can one ignore the problem when there is at present massive evidence that viral immune escape is now threatening humanity? We can hardly say we didn’t know – or were not warned.
In this agonizing letter I put all of my reputation and credibility at stake. I expect from you, guardians of mankind, at least the same. It is of utmost urgency. Do open the debate. By all means: turn the tide!
Why mass vaccination amidst a pandemic creates an irrepressible monster
THE key question is: why does nobody seem to bother about viral immune escape? Let me try to explain this by means of a more easily understood phenomenon: Antimicrobial resistance. One can easily extrapolate this scourge to resistance to our self-made ‘antiviral antibiotics’. Indeed, antibodies (Abs) produced by our own immune system can be considered self-made antiviral antibiotics, regardless of whether they are part of our innate immune system (so-called ‘natural’ Abs’) or elicited in response to specific pathogens (resulting in so-called ‘acquired’ Abs).
Natural Abs are not germ-specific whereas acquired Abs are specifically directed at the invading pathogen. At birth, our innate immune system is ‘unexperienced’ but well-established. It protects us from a multitude of pathogens, thereby preventing these pathogens from causing disease.
As the innate immune system cannot remember the pathogens it encountered (innate immunity has no so-called ‘immunological memory’), we can only continue to rely on it provided we keep it ‘trained’ well enough.
Training is achieved by regular exposure to a myriad of environmental agents, including pathogens. However, as we age, we will increasingly face situations where our innate immunity (often called ‘the first line of immune defense’) is not strong enough to halt the pathogen at the portal of entry (mostly mucosal barriers like respiratory or intestinal epithelia).
When this happens, the immune system has to rely on more specialized effectors of our immune system (i.e., antigen-specific Abs and T cells) to fight the pathogen. So, as we grow up, we increasingly mount pathogen-specific immunity, including highly specific Abs. As those have stronger affinity for the pathogen (e.g., virus) and can reach high concentrations, they can quite easily outcompete our natural Abs for binding to the pathogen/virus.
It is precisely this type of highly specific, high affinity Abs that current Covid-19 vaccines are inducing. Of course, the noble purpose of these Abs is to protect us against Covid-19. So, why then should there be a major concern using these vaccines to fight Covid-19?
Well, similar to the rules applying to classical antimicrobial antibiotics, it is paramount that our self-made ‘antiviral antibiotics’ are made available in sufficient concentration and are tailored at the specific features of our enemy.
This is why in case of bacterial disease it is critical to not only chose the right type of antibiotic (based on the results from an antibiogram) but to also take the antibiotic for long enough (according to the prescription).
Failure to comply with these requirements is at risk of granting microbes a chance to survive and hence, may cause the disease to fare up. A very similar mechanism may also apply to viruses, especially to viruses that can easily and rapidly mutate (which is, for example, the case with Coronaviruses); when the pressure exerted by the army’s (read: population’s) immune defense starts to threaten viral replication and transmission, the virus will take on another coat so that it can no longer be easily recognized and, therefore, attacked by the host immune system. The virus is now able to escape immunity (so-called: ‘immune escape’).
However, the virus can only rely on this strategy provided it still has room enough to replicate. Viruses, in contrast to the majority of bacteria, must rely on living host cells to replicate. This is why the occurrence of ‘escape mutants’ isn’t too worrisome as long as the likelihood for these variants to rapidly find another host is quite remote. However, that’s not particularly the case during a viral pandemic!
During a pandemic, the virus is spreading all over the globe with many subjects shedding and transmitting the virus (even including asymptomatic ‘carriers’). The higher the viral load, the higher the likelihood for the virus to bump into subjects who haven’t been infected yet or who were infected but didn’t develop symptoms. Unless they are sufficiently protected by their innate immune defense (through natural Abs), they will catch Covid-19 disease as they cannot rely on other, i.e., acquired Abs.
It has been extensively reported, indeed, that the increase in S (spike)-specific Abs in asymptomatically infected people is rather limited and only short-lived. Furthermore, these Abs have not achieved full maturity.
The combination of viral infection on a background of suboptimal Ab maturity and concentration enables the virus to select mutations allowing it to escape the immune pressure. The selection of those mutations preferably occurs in the S protein as this is the viral protein that is responsible for viral infectiousness.
As the selected mutations endow the virus with increased infectious capacity, it now becomes much easier for the virus to cause severe disease in infected subjects. The more people develop symptomatic disease, the better the virus can secure its propagation and perpetuation (people who get severe disease will shed more virus and for a longer period of time than asymptomatically infected subjects do).
Unfortunately, enough, the short-lived rise in S-specific Abs does, however, surface to bypass people’s innate/natural Ab. Those are put out of business as their affinity for S is lower than the affinity of S-specific Abs. This is to say that with an increasing rate of infection in the population, the number of subjects who get infected while experiencing a momentary increase in S-specific Abs will steadily increase.
Consequently, the number of subjects who get infected while experiencing a momentary decrease in their innate immunity will increase. As a result, a steadily increasing number of subjects will become more susceptible to getting severe disease instead of showing only mild symptoms (i.e., limited to the upper respiratory tract) or no symptoms at all.
During a pandemic, especially youngsters will be affected by this evolution as their natural Abs are not yet largely suppressed by a panoply of ‘acquired’, antigen-specific Abs. Natural Abs, and natural immunity in general, play a critical role in protecting us from pathogens as they constitute our first line of immune defense. In contrast to acquired immunity, innate immune responses protect against a large spectrum of pathogens (so don’t compromise or sacrifice your innate immune defense!).
Because natural Abs and innate immune cells recognize a diversified spectrum of foreign (i.e., non-self) agents (only some of which have pathogenic potential), it’s important, indeed, to keep it sufficiently exposed to environmental challenges.
By keeping the innate immune system (which, unfortunately, has no memory!) TRAINED, we can much more easily resist germs which have real pathogenic potential. It has, for example, been reported and scientifically proven that exposure to other, quite harmless Coronaviruses causing a ‘common cold ’ can provide protection, although short-lived, against Covid-19 and its loyal henchmen (i.e., the more infectious variants).
Suppression of innate immunity, especially in the younger age groups, can, therefore, become very problematic. There can be no doubt that lack of exposure due to stringent containment measures implemented as of the beginning of the pandemic has not been beneficial to keeping people’s innate immune system well trained.
As if this was not already heavily compromising innate immune defense in this population segment, there comes yet another force into play that will dramatically enhance morbidity and mortality rates in the younger age groups: MASS VACCINATION of the ELDERLY.
The more extensively the later age group will be vaccinated and hence, protected, the more the virus is forced to continue causing disease in younger age groups.
This is only going to be possible provided it escapes to the S-specific Abs that are momentarily raised in previously asymptomatically infected subjects. If the virus manages to do so, it can benefit from the (momentarily) suppressed innate immunity, thereby causing disease in an increasing number of these subjects and ensuring its own propagation.
Selecting targeted mutations in the S protein is, therefore, the way to go in order for the virus to enhance its infectiousness in candidates that are prone to getting the disease because of a transient weakness of their innate immune defense.
But in the meantime, we’re also facing a huge problem in vaccinated people as they’re now more and more confronted with infectious variants displaying a type of S protein that is increasingly different from the S edition comprised with the vaccine (the later edition originates from the original, much less infectious strain at the beginning of the pandemic).
The more variants become infectious (i.e., as a result of blocking access of the virus to the vaccinated segment of the population), the less vaccinal Abs will protect. Already now, lack of protection is leading to viral shedding and transmission in vaccine recipients who are exposed to these more infectious strains (which, by the way, increasingly dominate the field).
This is how we are currently turning vaccines into asymptomatic carriers shedding infectious variants.
At some point, in a likely very near future, it’s going to become more profitable (in term of ‘return on selection investment’) for the virus to just add another few mutations (maybe just one or two) to the S protein of viral variants (already endowed with multiple mutations enhancing infectiousness) in an attempt to further strengthen its binding to the receptor (ACE-2) expressed on the surface of permissive epithelial cells.
This will now allow the new variant to outcompete vaccinal Abs for binding to the ACE receptor. This is to say that at this stage, it would only take very few additional targeted mutations within the viral receptor-binding domain to fully resist S-specific ant-Covid-19 Abs, regardless whether the later are elicited by the vaccine or by natural infection.
At that stage, the virus will, indeed, have managed to gain access to a huge reservoir of subjects who have now become highly susceptible to disease as their S-specific Abs have now become useless in terms of protection but still manage to provide for long-lived suppression of their innate immunity (i.e., natural infection, and especially vaccination, elicit relatively long-lived specific Ab titers). The susceptible reservoir comprises both, vaccinated people and those who’re left with sufficient S-specific Abs due to previous Covid-19 disease).So, MISSION
ACCOMPLISHED for Covid-19 but a DISASTROUS SITUATION for all vaccinated subjects and Covid-19 seropositive people as they’ve now lost both, their acquired and innate immune defense against Covid-19 (while highly infectious strains are circulating!).
That’s ‘one small step for the virus, one giant catastrophe for mankind’, which is to say that we’ll have whipped up the virus in the younger population up to a level that it now takes little effort for Covid-19 to transform into a highly infectious virus that completely ignores both the innate arm of our immune system as well as the adaptive/acquired one (regardless of whether the acquired Abs resulted from vaccination or natural infection).
The effort for the virus is now becoming even more negligible given that many vaccine recipients are now exposed to highly infectious viral variants while having received only a single shot of the vaccine.
Hence, they are endowed with Abs that have not yet acquired optimal functionality. There is no need to explain that this is just going to further enhance immune escape. Basically, we’ll very soon be confronted with a super-infectious virus that completely resists our most precious defense mechanism: The human immune system.
From all of the above, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to imagine how the consequences of the extensive and erroneous human intervention in this pandemic are not going to wipe out large parts of our human population.
One could only think of very few other strategies to achieve the same level of efficiency in turning a relatively harmless virus into a bioweapon of mass destruction.
It’s certainly also worth mentioning that mutations in the S protein (i.e., exactly the same protein that is subject to selection of escape mutations) are known to enable Coronaviruses to cross species barriers.
This is to say that the risk that vaccine-mediated immune escape could allow the virus to jump to other animal species, especially industrial livestock (e.g., pig and poultry farms), is not negligible. These species are already known to host several different Coronaviruses and are usually housed in farms with high stocking density.
Similar to the situation with influenza virus, these species could than serve as an additional reservoir for SARS-COVID-2 virus.
As pathogens have co-evolved with the host immune system, natural pandemics of acute self-limiting viral infections have been shaped such as to take a toll on human lives that is not higher than strictly required.
Due to human intervention, the course of this pandemic has been thoroughly disturbed as of the very beginning. Widespread and stringent infection prevention measures combined with mass vaccination campaigns using inadequate vaccines will undoubtedly lead to a situation where the pandemic is getting increasingly ‘out of control’.
Paradoxically, the only intervention that could offer a perspective to end this pandemic (other than to let it run its disastrous course) is …VACCINATION. Of course, the type of vaccines to be used would be completely different of conventional vaccines in that they’re not inducing the usual suspects, i.e., B and T cells, but NK cells.
There is, indeed, compelling scientific evidence that these cells play a key role in facilitating complete elimination of Covid-19 at an early stage of infection in asymptomatically infected subjects.
NK cells are part of the cellular arm of our innate immune system and, alike natural Abs, they are capable of recognizing and attacking a broad and diversified spectrum of pathogenic agents.
There is a sound scientific rationale to assume that it is possible to ‘prime’ NK cells in ways for them to recognize and kill Coronaviruses at large (include all their variants) at an early stage of infection. NK cells have increasingly been described to be endowed with the capacity to acquire immunological memory.
By educating these cells in ways that enable them to durably recognize and target Coronavirus-infected cells, our immune system could be perfectly armed for a targeted attack to the universe of Coronaviruses prior to exposure.
As NK cell-based immune defense provides sterilizing immunity and allows for broad-spectrum and fast protection, it is reasonable to assume that harnessing our innate immune cells is going to be the only type of human intervention left to halt the dangerous spread of highly infectious Covid-19 variants.
If we, human beings, are committed to perpetuating our species, we have no choice left but to eradicate these highly infectious viral variants. This will, indeed, require large vaccination campaigns. However, NK cell-based vaccines will primarily enable our natural immunity to be better prepared (memory!) and to induce herd immunity (which is exactly the opposite of what current Covid-19 vaccines do as those increasingly turn vaccine recipients into asymptomatic carriers who are shedding virus).
So, there is not one second left for gears to be switched and to replace the current killer vaccines by life-saving vaccines.
I am appealing to the WHO and all stakeholders involved, no matter their conviction, to immediately declare such action as THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY OF INTERNATIONAL CONCERN.