Tuesday, December 21, 2021

He lied

 On 3/21/21, Israeli politician Naftali Bennett appeared on national Israeli television during the election campaign and stated “I won’t allow Yair Lapid to be prime minister, including in a rotation (agreement.)” and “I will not establish a government based on the support of Mansour Abbas from the Islamic Movement.” He signed a document affirming those words and held it up to the camera.  In the first weeks of June of 2021, after the election, Bennett entered a rotation agreement with Lapid and established a government with the support of Mansour Abbas. 




Monday, December 6, 2021

Those anti-science guys

I have some family and friends who assert that anybody who questions the Biden administration's policies on COVID is an anti-science Trump-worshiping conspiracy nut who get all their information from the Internet. How's that for some labeling and name-calling?

Let's meet some of those "anti-science" people.

Dr. Harvey Risch, MD, PhD 

Professor of Epidemiology in the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Yale School of Public Health and Yale School of Medicine. Dr. Risch received his MD degree from the University of California San Diego and PhD from the University of Chicago. Dr. Risch is Associate Editor of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Editor of the International Journal of Cancer, and was for six years a Member of the Board of Editors, the American Journal of epidemiology. Dr. Risch is an author of more than 350 original peer-reviewed research publications in the medical literature and those research papers have been cited by other scientific publications more than 44,000 times. Dr. Risch has an h-index of 94.

What's the h-index you ask?  It is a metric that measures the productivity and citation impact of a science scholars publications. Its developer Professor Jorge Hirsch, "suggested that, for physicists, a value for h of about 12 might be typical for advancement to tenure (associate professor) at major [US] research universities. A value of about 18 could mean a full professorship, 15–20 could mean a fellowship in the American Physical Society, and 45 or higher could mean membership in the United States National Academy of Sciences. Hirsch estimated that after 20 years a "successful scientist" would have an h-index of 20, an "outstanding scientist" would have an h-index of 40, and a "truly unique" individual would have an h-index of 60." (Wikipedia) Once again, Dr. Risch has an h-index of 94. In other words, he is a world-class scientist specializing in Epidemiology. For those who don't know, "Epidemiology is the study and analysis of the distribution, patterns and determinants of health and disease conditions in defined populations."

Here's some of what Dr. Risch has to say about COVID:

Natural immunity is needed "to combat other viruses, other strains [of coronavirus] that may be coming as well. And for longer-lasting protection, natural immunity is much longer lasting that vaxxed immunity”

"The vaccine immunity has a finite lifespan of somewhere between three and six months and it’s losing that over time, and more people are getting infected again." (Laura Ingraham Show)

“Some months ago, the CDC stopped counting breakthrough cases … the large numbers of cases in people who had been vaccinated. So, of course, those cases don’t register for the CDC’s counts....”

“What the doctors are telling me is that more than half of the new COVID cases they are treating are people who have already been vaccinated. They have estimated that 60% of the new patients they have treated are people who have been vaccinated."


MARTIN KULLDORFF, PhD

Professor, Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Professor, Medicine, Brigham And Women's Hospital

Kulldorff is a member of the scientific council for drug safety and risk management at the Food and Drug Administration, and a member of the Centers for Disease Control's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. He is author or co-author of 201 Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles.



“I don’t think children should be vaccinated for COVID. I’m a huge fan of vaccinating children for measles, for mumps, for polio, for rotavirus, and many other diseases, that’s critical. But COVID is not a huge threat to children.” 

“They can be infected, just like they can get the common cold, but they’re not a big threat. They don’t die from this, except in very rare circumstances. So if you want to talk about protecting children or keeping children safe, I think we can talk about traffic accidents, for example, which they are really at some risk.

“And there are other things that we should make sure [of] to keep children safe. But COVID is not a big risk factor for children.”

“Hospitals should hire nurses & other staff with natural immunity…They are the ones who are least likely to infect the residents. [Yet] we’re doing the opposite. They’re being fired.”

“One example is from Sweden, during the first wave in the spring of 2020, which affected Sweden quite strongly,” Kulldorff said. “But Sweden decided to keep daycare and schools open for all children ages 1 to 15. And there are 1.8 million such children who got through the first wave without vaccines, of course, without masks, without any sort of distancing in schools.

“If a child was sick, they were told to stay home. But that was basically it. And you know how many of those 1.8 million children died from COVID? Zero. Only a few hospitalizations. So this is not a risky disease for children.” (EpochTV)

Kulldorff is one of the three authors, along with Sunetra Gupta and Jay Bhattacharya, of the 2020 Great Barrington Declaration, which advocated letting COVID-19 spread in lower-risk groups to promote herd immunity while advocating "focused protection" of older, high-risk groups.[7][8] The World Health Organization (WHO) and many other academic and public-health bodies said the declaration's strategy lacked a sound scientific basis,[9][10] and warned that it could cause many unnecessary deaths and could result in recurrent epidemics.[11][12] (Wikipedia)

Kulldorff has opposed lockdowns, contact tracing and mask mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic, and has appeared at media events to support the Great Barrington Declaration.[13][14][15][16][17][18] He has spoken out against COVID-19 vaccine passports,[19] but supports COVID-19 vaccinations.[20] In 2021, Kulldorff questioned the strategy of vaccinating younger people, citing scarcity of vaccines to more vunerable older people in developing countries.[20]" (Wikipedia)

Dr. Scott W. Atlas, MD. 

Senior fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution. MD from University of Chicago. From 1998 to 2012 he was a professor and chief of neuroradiology at the Stanford University Medical Center. Dr. Atlas is also the editor of the leading textbook in the field, the best‐selling Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain and Spine, now in its 5th edition and officially translated from English into Mandarin, Spanish, and Portuguese.




It never rains in Medinas Yisroel?

Got on board a westbound 747

Didn't think before deciding what to do
Oh, that talk of opportunities, TV breaks and movies
Rang true, sure rang true
Seems it never rains in southern California
Seems I've often heard that kind of talk before
It never rains in California
But girl, don't they warn ya?
It pours, man, it pours
Out of work, I'm out of my head
Out of self respect, I'm out of bread
I'm underloved, I'm underfed
I wanna go home
It never rains in California
But girl, don't they warn ya?
It pours, man, it pours
Will you tell the folks back home I nearly made it?
Had offers but don't know which one to take
Please don't tell 'em how you found me
Don't tell 'em how you found me
Gimme a break, give me a break
Seems it never rains in southern California
Seems I've often heard that kind of talk before
It never rains in California
But girl, don't they warn ya?
It pours, man, it pours

Thursday, December 2, 2021

Doctors and Scientists opposing COVID shot

Dr Bruce Boros

Dr Christopher Rake

Dr James Nellenschwander

Dr Judy Wilyman

Dr Michael McConville

Dr Nour De San

Dr Peter Gotzche

Dr Rheiner Fuellmich

Dr Shankara Chetty

Dr Stella Immanuel

Dr, Carolyn Bosack

Dr, Stevn Kirsch

Dr. Afzal Niaz

Dr. Alexandra Shustina

Dr. Amandha Vollmer

Dr. Amir Shahar

Dr. Andreas Noack

Dr. Andrew Kaufman

Dr. Andrew Moulden

Dr. Andrew Wakefield

Dr. Anne Fierlafijin

Dr. Anne McCloskey

Dr. Anne Mcclosky

Dr. Annie Bukacek

Dr. Ariyana Love

Dr. Aseem Malhotra

Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger

Dr. Ben Carson

Dr. Ben Edwards

Dr. Ben Tapper

Dr. Boyd Hailey

Dr. Brian Hooker

Dr. Bruce Patterson

Dr. Bryan Ardis

Dr. Bryan Tyson

Dr. Byram W. Bridle

Dr. Carrie Madej

Dr. Charles Hoffe

Dr. Chris Milburn

Dr. Chris Shaw

Dr. Christiana Parks

Dr. Christiane Northrop

Dr. Dan Erickson

Dr. Dan Stock

Dr. Daniel Cullum

Dr. Daniel Griffin

Dr. Daniel Nagase

Dr. Darell Wolfe

Dr. David Ayoub

Dr. David Brownstein

Dr. David Davis

Dr. David Martin

Dr. Eddy Bettermann MD

Dr. Elizabeth Eads

Dr. Elizabeth Evans

Dr. Franc Zalewski

Dr. Francis Christian

Dr. Frank Engley

Dr. Gert Vandeen Bossche

Dr. Ghislaine Lanctot

Dr. Gina Gold

Dr. Guido Hofmann

Dr. Harold Butram

Dr. Harvey Risch

Dr. Heather Gessling

Dr. Heiko Shoning

Dr. Henry Ealy

Dr. Hervé Seligmann

Dr. Hilde de Smet

Dr. Ivette Lozano

Dr. Jack Wolfson

Dr. James Grundvig

Dr. James Lyons-Weiler

Dr. James Todaro

Dr. Jane Orient

Dr. Jane Ruby

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya

Dr. Jayne Donegan

Dr. Jeff Barke

Dr. Jessica Rose

Dr. Jim Meehan

Dr. Joe Lapado

Dr. Joel Hirschhorn

Dr. Johan Denis

Dr. John Carpay

Dr. John Littell

Dr. John Witcher

Dr. Joseph Mercola

Dr. Judy Mitkovitz

Dr. Julie Ponesse

Dr. Kelly Brogan

Dr. Ken Stoller

Dr. Kerry Mullis

Dr. Kevin Corbett

Dr. Kevin Stillwagon

Dr. Kurt Malholm

Dr. Kurt Malhom

Dr. Larry Palevsky

Dr. Lee Merritt

Dr. Lorraine Day

Dr. Luc Montainger

Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic

Dr. Luis Miguel de Benito

Dr. Manuel Alonso

Dr. Mark Brody

Dr. Mark Mcdonald

Dr. Mark Trozzi

Dr. Mary Tally Bowden

Dr. May Ann Block

Dr. Mayer Eiesenstien

Dr. Meryl Nass

Dr. Michael Elice

Dr. Michael Lake

Dr. Michael Mcdowell

Dr. Michael Palmer

Dr. Michael Yeadon

Dr. Mobeen Syed

Dr. Mohammed Adil

Dr. Nancy Burks

Dr. Natalia Prego Cancelo

Dr. Nathan Thompson

Dr. Nicole Delepine

Dr. Pamela Popper

Dr. Pascal Sacre

Dr. Patricia Lee

Dr. Patrick Phillips

Dr. Paul Cottrell

Dr. Paul Thomas

Dr. Peter Doshi

Dr. Peter Mcullough

Dr. Peter Schirmacher

Dr. Peterson Pierre

Dr. Phillip Incao

Dr. Phillip McMillan

Dr. Pierre Gilbert

Dr. Pierre Kory

Dr. Pior Rubis

Dr. R. Zac Cox

Dr. Ralph ER Sundberg

Dr. Randi Juanta

Dr. Rashid A.Buttar

Dr. Ray Page

Dr. Raymond Obamsawin

Dr. RC Tent

Dr. Rebecca Carley

Dr. Richard Bartlett

Dr. Richard Deth

Dr. Richard Flemming

Dr. Richard Moskowitz

Dr. Richard Urso

Dr. Rima Laibow

Dr. Robert Malone

Dr. Robert Mendelson

Dr. Robert Rowen

Dr. Robert Young

Dr. Roby Mitchell

Dr. Rochagné Kilian

Dr. Rochagne Killian

Dr. Roger Hodkison

Dr. Russel Blaylock

Dr. Ryan Cole

Dr. Sam Duby

Dr. Sam Eggertsen

Dr. Sam Sigoloff

Dr. Scott Jensen

Dr. Scott Youngblood

Dr. Sean Brooks

Dr. Sherry TennPenny

Dr. Shiv Chopra

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai

Dr. Simone Gold

Dr. Stephanie Seneff

Dr. Steven Gundry

Dr. Steven Hotze

Dr. Steven LaTulippe

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi

Dr. Susan McCreadie

Dr. Suzanne Humphries

Dr. Terry Wahls

Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych

Dr. Theresa Long

Dr. Theressa Deisher

Dr. Thomas Ynges

Dr. Tori Bark

Dr. Troy Ross

Dr. Vanessa Passov

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko

Dr. Yoav Yehezkelli

Dr. Zandra Botha

Prof. Retsif Levi


Thursday, November 25, 2021

The totalitarian path

The totalitarian regimes responsible for the most heinous atrocities in the 20th century – think Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Pol Pot – they didn’t get there overnight.

They used fear to control. They excluded the ‘dirty’ people, softly at first. They justified the exclusion. They moved to harder exclusions and eventually eliminated people either socially, or physically.

In 21st century, Australia state premiers are racing down that familiar path trying to out-tyrant each other, drunk on power, setting up their own biosecurity police states complete with medical apartheid.

Sadly, we’ve enabled it refusing to rein them in – worse, supplying the Australian immunization register data that underpins this medical apartheid.

Fear is the justification of choice for coercion and control with non-vaccinated Australians increasingly demonized, ostracized and socially eradicated.

In Queensland, the premier tweeted that people not vaccinated raised red flags – Not just one, but 22 of them.

The media politicians and health bureaucrats all claim Covid-19 is now a pandemic of the unvaccinated, but there is no justification for such demonization.

In a German study, 55 percent of symptomatic patients over 60 were fully vaccinated. Gibraltar, where all 34,000 residents are fully vaccinated, is recording 60 new cases a day.

The totalitarian path, the path that we are unquestionably on, has never ended well.

The solution is a rediscovery of human dignity, along with – and I don’t say this lightly – civil disobedience.

Australian Queensland MP George Robert Christensen, Nov. 24, 2021 before Australian Parliament

Wednesday, November 24, 2021

The Partridge Family's "I Think I Love You" is a terrible song.

The Partridge Family's "I Think I Love You" is a terrible song. It's a monotone monologue. There's almost no melody. That it became a worldwide sensation is a testimony to the incredible singing of David Cassidy. This was our first exposure to him and we all went crazy for it, despite the song.

David had a smooth voice that was loaded with personality. It had the quality of making you feel that he was in the room with you. And he could sing powerfully and do it on the dime. It was like a car going 0 to 60 in 4 seconds. His timing was impeccable. Being a musician and gifted comedic actor played a role there. Each one of his artistic gifts aided the other. He was one of a kind, one of the best pop singers ever.

Sunday, November 7, 2021

demoralization

 “As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore,” said Bezmenov. “A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures; even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him [a] concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it, until he [receives] a kick in his fan-bottom. When a military boot crashes his balls then he will understand. But not before that. That’s the [tragedy] of the situation of demoralization.”

–Yuri Bezmenov [1983]

Thursday, November 4, 2021

funeral director

 https://seemorerocks.is/uk-funeral-director-i-just-see-the-dead-babies-in-the-fridges-full-interview/


Before the covid shot, they marked everything as covid based on a test. cancer deaths, whatever, they made them covid. now with the shot many more are dropping dead but they don't mark them as covid. but they mostly are blood/heart clotting deaths, and many miscarriages.

Wednesday, November 3, 2021

the ignorance of the masses

Rav Avigdor Miller on Learning From Voting Mistakes


Q:

What can we learned from the election of Elizabeth Holtzman (Democrat, House of Representatives and then District Attorney of Kings County, Brooklyn)?

A:

We can learn a great deal. We can learn that the public is not aware of the necessity of protecting their interests. I won't go into that now; next time when there is an election we have to talk about it more. But it is important for the Orthodox public to wake up – the other public are beheimos; we can't talk about them because they don’t understand the issues at all; they read the newspapers, they listen to the radio, and they are prisoners of television and they swallow all the propaganda that is fed to them. And if a Democrat party chairman tells them to vote straight Democrat, so that is what they do and therefore they elect somebody who is harmful for their interests. And many of the benefits to the public that could have been gained by means of a different candidate go lost.

People who want to protect their interests, have to take action; and it is already a little late in the season – the Orthodox Jews have to wake up and realize they have to vote not for what somebody promises to give them some benefit, some handout, some small program or some privilege; they have to vote for the overall benefits to the general public because what the public benefits from, the Orthodox Jew is also going to benefit. It is very important to be aware of the issues and if you yourself are not fully competent, then you should consult the Torah leaders who know what is what.

TAPE # 385

Thursday, October 28, 2021

The Beatles were not great songwriters

 

Whenever you see lists of the best songwriters, Lennon-McCartney are near the top of the list, if not the top. But, here's one for ya. The Beatles were not great songwriters, certainly not great lyricists. Why do they get deemed as such? I think their whole production appealed to people, the combination of writing, singing, and production. Lennon and McCartney were great singers. And they were innovative in the way they put everything together. But if you dig into the songs, things are not so magical. It's like Wayne Gretsky or Tom Brady. Not the fastest, strongest, or most agile, but very smart about the game.


Here we go. Let's start with their first hit.


Love, love me do

You know I love you

I'll always be true

So please, love me do

Whoa, love me do


OK now, moving on. How about this one?


Oh yeah, I'll tell you something

I think you'll understand

When I say that something

I wanna hold your hand

I wanna hold your hand

I wanna hold your hand


And then there's:


She loves you, yeah, yeah, yeah

She loves you, yeah, yeah, yeah

She loves you, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah


You think you lost your love

Well, I saw her yesterday

It's you she's thinking of

And she told me what to say


She says she loves you

And you know that can't be bad

Yes, she loves you

And you know you should be glad


There is no poetry in these lyrics, other than maybe the line “When I say that something.” Yes, the words rhyme, but that's not all there is to poetry. Poetry is word play that makes your heart tingle. It's different than spoken speech. Poetry uses metaphor, symbolism, and unusual imagery to evoke meaning and feeling that goes beyond prosaic speech.


Here's an example of poetry found in rock music, written by Jagger and Richards of the Rolling Stones.


I see a red door and I want it painted black

No colours anymore, I want them to turn black

I see the girls walk by, dressed in their summer clothes

I have to turn my head until my darkness goes


Now that is cool. First you have the image of a red door, not something one sees every day, and a guy who expresses his anger and negativity by wanting it painted black. He wants all colors painted black. That is not prosaic speech. He doesn't just say, “I am angry.” He portrays that with imagery. He evokes a meaning with wonderful word economy. He is angry. He is bitter. Why is his so bitter? The next line gives us a clue. Seeing the sexy ladies in their summer clothes frustrates him sexually. This is conveyed as darkness that fills his head. Darkness is black. He wants everything painted that way. That is four powerful lines of poetry that expresses what maybe most men have felt at some point in their lives, if not every day.


Paint It Black was released in May, 1966 and Love Me Do in 1962, so maybe it's only fair to look at some of the Beatles later work as they were kids who were maturing rapidly. The Revolver Album came out in 1966. The most famous songs on that record are arguably Good Day Sunshine, Eleanor Rigby, Got to Get You into My Life, She Said She Said, Yellow Submarine, and Here, There and Everywhere. Let's look at those.


I need to laugh, and when the sun is out

I've got something I can laugh about

I feel good, in a special way

I'm in love and it's a sunny day


Good day sunshine

Good day sunshine

Good day sunshine


We take a walk, the sun is shining down

Burns my feet as they touch the ground


The last line has a touch of poetic imagery but it's simple observation. It has no bearing on the song. It's an empty song about the wonderful feeling of being in love, a McCartney theme. Silly Love Songs. Here's another one:


I was alone, I took a ride

I didn't know what I would find there

Another road where maybe I could see another kind of mind there


Ooh, then I suddenly see you

Ooh, did I tell you I need you

Every single day of my life


You didn't run, you didn't lie

You knew I wanted just to hold you

And had you gone you knew in time we'd meet again

For I had told you


Ooh, you were meant to be near me

Ooh, and I want you to hear me

Say we'll be together every day


Got to get you into my life


Even though romantic fantasies lead most people to heartache, with McCartney it's all so lovely. This lyric is pretty empty; although the first line ain't bad. I was alone and took a ride to find another kind of mind. That's imagery. We don't normally think of ourselves as looking for other kinds of minds. There is evocative imagery in the first lines.


The whole production is very catchy, with the horns and all. And that's true of many Beatle songs. Take Yellow Submarine:


In the town where I was born

Lived a man who sailed to sea

And he told us of his life

In the land of submarines


So we sailed up to the sun

'Til we found the sea of green

And we lived beneath the waves

In our yellow submarine


We all live in a yellow submarine

Yellow submarine, yellow submarine

We all live in a yellow submarine

Yellow submarine, yellow submarine


What does any of that mean? It's a silly children's song. The idea that we all live in a Yellow Submarine is intriguing at first. But after thinking about it for 50 years, one realizes it means nothing.


Lennon called Here, There, and Everywhere one of his favorite Beatle songs. Yes, it's sung sweetly with soothing harmonies, and the rhyme in the title is intriguing. But what follows?


To lead a better life I need my love to be here...


Here, making each day of the year

Changing my life with the wave of her hand

Nobody can deny that there's something there


There, running my hands through her hair

Both of us thinking how good it can be

Someone is speaking but she doesn't know he's there


I want her everywhere and if she's beside me

I know I need never care

But to love her is to need her everywhere

Knowing that love is to share



The line “Changing my life with the wave of her hand” is poetic but pablum. Once again, it's a silly love song. It's not profound, it's not wise. It's love drug.


Compare to this gem from the Stones, written in 1962:


It is the evening of the day

I sit and watch the children play

Smiling faces I can see

But not for me

I sit and watch

As tears go by


My riches can't buy everything

I want to hear the children sing

All I hear is the sound

Of rain falling on the ground

I sit and watch

As tears go by


It is the evening of the day

I sit and watch the children play

Doin' things I used to do

They think are new

I sit and watch

As tears go by


Once again, great word economy from the Stones. And so evocative. It's evening, when loneliness hurts the most. The singer sees smiling faces, but they are not smiling for him. They are the smiles of strangers who smile at each other. He is left out. I watch as tears go by. What is that? Is the happiness of these strangers tears for him as they are reminders of his loneliness? I'll go with that. It's a mysterious line but it packs a bunch. It's not nonsensical as are so many Beatles lines, particularly those from Lennon.


She said, "I know what it's like to be dead.

I know what it is to be sad."

And she's making me feel like I've never been born


I said, "Who put all those things in your head?

Things that make me feel that I'm mad.

And you're making me feel like I've never been born."


She said, "You don't understand what I said."

I said, "No, no, no, you're wrong.

When I was a boy everything was right,

Everything was right."


I said, "Even though you know what you know,

I know that I'm ready to leave

'Cause you're making me feel like I've never been born."


She said, "You don't understand what I said."

I said, "No, no, no, you're wrong.

When I was a boy everything was right,

Everything was right."


There's so much wrong with that lyric. For one, it is a jumble of nothing. What is this song about? But worse, it's so wordy. Lots of Lennon songs are like that.


Take A Day in the Life. This is arguably the most powerful song from the album always credited as the best of all time in rock.


I read the news today, oh boy

About a lucky man who made the grade

And though the news was rather sad

Well, I just had to laugh

I saw the photograph


He blew his mind out in a car;

He didn't notice that the lights had changed

A crowd of people stood and stared

They'd seen his face before

Nobody was really sure if he was from the House of Lords


I saw a film today, oh boy;

The English army had just won the war

A crowd of people turned away

But I just had to look

Having read the book


I'd love to turn you on


What are reading his journal? Did he put the slightest effort into crafting those words? I guess it's a song about the dark side of fame, but it doesn't teach us anything we didn't know. And most of it makes no sense. “He blew his mind out in a car; He didn't notice that the lights had changed.” That seems profound, but one realizes after thinking it over for half a century that it's random thought. It doesn't mean anything. Lennon admits that the lyrics are based on newspaper headlines. He's a guy at a coffee table reading headlines to us. That is not poetry. And so as not to pile on the abuse, I'm not even getting into the middle part from McCartney about sitting on a bus and dragging a comb across the head.


Still it's a powerful song. Why? Well the singing is top notch. Lennon owed one of the best pop voices ever. And the whole production with the piano that takes off like an airplane and the orchestral finale is titillating to the ears. This is an example of the Beatle magic. The lyrics are weak, but the whole thing works. They were innovative sound makers. But they are shallow.


Here's another one:


Let me take you down

'Cause I'm going to strawberry fields

Nothing is real and nothing to get hung about

Strawberry fields forever


Living is easy with eyes closed

Misunderstanding all you see

It's getting hard to be someone but it all works out

It doesn't matter much to me


Let me take you down

'Cause I'm going to strawberry fields

Nothing is real and nothing to get hung about

Strawberry fields forever


No one I think is in my tree

I mean it must be high or low

That is you can't, you know tune in but it's all right

That is I think it's not too bad


Just random lines, cliches, nonsense. What do strawberries have to do with any of this? It's just imagery. Penny Lane is another song like that. Just images. They're OK. It's a catchy tune. Barbershops and little kids laughing and a man who wears a mack in the pouring rain, a nostalgic memory of a childhood and warm feelings for a neighborhood. It's saccharine. It's not a crime to make such a song, but it's not genius profundity.


Compare to:


You can't always get what you want

But if you try sometime you find

You get what you need


That's wisdom. That's the Stones again, you know the guys who were just a blues cover band according to McCartney. Much of the rest of the lyric gets a bit cryptic, like an attempt to copy the Lennon I am the Walrus style random imagery. Jagger seemed to have a weird insecurity with regard to the Beatles, and that is a shame because in my view he is far more talented. But hard as he may have tried to imitate Lennon, the song still makes sense. It's all about people who don't get what they want.


I saw her today at the reception

A glass of wine in her hand

I knew she would meet her connection

At her feet was a footloose man


It's not clear at first what the footloose (free from ties) man has to do with anything, but the stanza seems to be about a woman who wants one man and is getting another. The latter sits at her feet. He's footloose. Not marriage material for sure. So upon second thought, the footloose man does fit into all this. And we didn't have to wait 50 years to figure it out. Again, great word economy and great imagery, all of which ties into the theme. It should be no surprise that Jagger attended the London School of Economics. For a guy who Don McClean depicted as Jack Flash and the devil, he was damn smart.


You want word economy. Try this:


I can't get no satisfaction

I can't get no girl reaction

'Cause I try and I try and I try and I try

I can't get no, I can't get no


Sexual frustration again conveyed in a few lines. After a few bars, “I can't get no” sums it all up.


The Beatles have their moments. “Well, she was just seventeen. You know what I mean.” Is good. This is good: “And anytime you feel the pain, Hey, Jude, refrain. Don't carry the world upon your shoulders. For well you know that it's a fool Who plays it cool By making his world a little colder.”


There's wisdom there and compassion. Hey Jude is quite good. Eleanor Rigby is another one from McCartney that qualifies as strong writing. Then there's Blackbird.


Blackbird singing in the dead of night

Take these broken wings and learn to fly

All your life

You were only waiting for this moment to arise


As usual with McCartney, it's all so simple. He lives in a simple world. But the song is encouraging. It has lifted me up at times like an affirmation. There's symbolism, effective imagery.


Yesterday is darker, not that a song has to be dark to be good.


Yesterday all my troubles seemed so far away.

Now it looks as though they're here to stay.

Oh, I believe in yesterday.


Suddenly, I'm not half the man I used to be.

There's a shadow hanging over me.

Oh, yesterday came suddenly.


Believing in yesterday. That's no prosaic speech. It's an unhealthy sentiment, but it's something people do. That's good song writing.


McCartney wasn't bad. But wasn't a genius lyricist. Unfortunately, he's called that so often that he actually published a book of his lyrics as a poetry book. So you saw Blackberry, which is a good lyric, presented as poetry, which it really isn't.


Lennon was a disturbed man and his songs show it.


I am he

As you are he

As you are me

And we are all together


See how they run

Like pigs from a gun

See how they fly

I'm crying


Sitting on a cornflake

Waiting for the van to come

Corporation tee shirt

Stupid bloody Tuesday

Man, you been a naughty boy

You let your face grow long


Means nothing, just a collection of weird imagery. And that's fine. The whole song grabs you, but again that's not because of the lyric. It's singing, creative noise making, and production.


Compare to the Stones again:


Angie, Angie

When will those clouds all disappear?

Angie, Angie

Where will it lead us from here?


With no loving in our souls

And no money in our coats

You can't say we're satisfied

But Angie, Angie

You can't say we never tried


Angie, you're beautiful, yeah

But ain't it time we said goodbye?


The lyric is pure heartache in part because it's so confusing. He loves Angie. Her kisses still taste sweet. She's beautiful. She cries for him. So why should they say goodbye? Is it because there's no money in their coats? Lots of lovers with no money have stayed together. The clouds won't disappear, but that's vague. What specifically is the problem? Is it because there no loving in their souls? Are they incapable of love? That is a tragedy. There's pathos here. It's powerful. And the singing and production are as good as anything the Beatles ever did.


So there's some of it. And I only compared to the Stones, didn't bring in Dylan, Springsteen, Neil Young, Joni Mitchell, Goffin and other great lyricists. I don't count the Beatles among them. And if you are not a great lyricist, you are not a great song writer. At least pair up with one as Elton John and Carole King did.









demoralize

 It takes from fifteen to twenty years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy. Exposed to the ideology of the enemy. In other words, Marxism–Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least three generations of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism, American patriotism. The result, the result you can see. Most of the people who graduated in the ’60s, drop-outs or half-baked intellectuals, are now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass media, educational system. You are stuck with them. You cannot get rid of them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern. You cannot change their minds. Even if you expose them to authentic information, even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still cannot change the basic perception and the logic of behavior. In other words, these people — the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible. To rid society of these people you need another twenty or fifteen years to educate a new generation of patriotically-minded, commonsense people who would be acting in favor and in the interests of the United States society.

Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov

Wednesday, October 6, 2021

Rabbonim: Do not pressure the Klal to take a potentialy dangerous vaccine

 Rumble — Counter to what is being told - many Rabbonim are against taking this vaccine based on its current safety profile.

The climate of pressure and intimidation must stop and we must stand in defense of those who choose not to take it.


https://rumble.com/vndg1f-rabbonim-do-not-pressure-the-klal-to-take-a-potentialy-dangerous-vaccine.html

Thursday, September 30, 2021

Address of Rav Yosef Zalman Bloch shlita,

 


Address of Rav Yosef Zalman Bloch shlita, [son of Rosh Yeshivas Telshe Hagaon Rav Elya Meir zt”l] Rav of Lakewood Minyan [Monsey] and Rosh Kollel Eitz Chaim

 

Let me begin by saying that I am far from being an anti-vaxer. In fact all my children B”H have all the vaccines. In fact, my policy for mosdos that asked me has been, that they are entitled to insist that children be vaccinated in all of the old-fashioned vaccines. So my position is not anti-vax. I am now speaking specifically about the new COVID so-called vaccine. Let me begin by saying the following; I don’t really need to add to the discussion. Anybody who will study the subject intensely, who will do his own research, will see the truth, and will have such a pachad that there will be no discussion necessary. Sy [both] mi’tzad the mitzius, it’s horrendous and frightening what’s happening right now, and also what ch”v could happen in the next few years.

 

Benefit vs. Risk

 

The benefits of the vaccine are mamash a joke. Baruch Hashem without the vaccine things were fine. The entire matzav had subsided and everything was on a good matzav. For people below age seventy they said the recovery rate was over 99.5 [for young people it was 99.997], and there was very little sakanah. All of a sudden now they are pushing the vaccine, not stam, I don’t remember in my lifetime such a huge push of propaganda non-stop to get people to take it. That itself should show you something is fishy, something’s wrong here. And they’re pushing it even on children. One of the biggest chasdei Hashem was that children were completely absent from the picture. Baruch Hashem children didn’t get it. Now they want to push the COVID vaccine on children. Why?

 

Fake News

 

Now as I’ve said there is nothing to talk about, it’s not necessary to discuss this; if you do your research you’ll find the truth yourself. The problem is that the frumme oilam gets the newspapers, and they see a report from Associated Press, CNBC, Reuters, CBS, and they think they have the information. However, all the frumme newspapers get their information from the mainstream media. So they’re just regurgitating all of the shkarim that are coming from all of the goyishe sources, without any kind of information about the truth, or what’s really happening. Now, the frumme oilam doesn’t realize the amount of propaganda that’s being hoisted on the world. There is immense pressure now being employed to convince people to take this so-called vaccine. And people are unaware of the truth. Now of course, many people have a vested interest in pushing it, and there are many temimim that haven’t learned to mistrust the sheker, and they feel that if you’re against this vaccine you must be a prehistoric creature that doesn’t understand what’s going-on in the world, and you don’t understand the necessity for a vaccine. But that’s not the truth.

 

Real News

 

What’s happening is that in Eretz Yisroel they are having hospital admissions of hundreds of people a day. The doctors say they can’t talk, if they open their mouth the government will take away their license, or worse. There is a terrible milchamah going on; they want to push this vaccine. The dangers are o’yom v’norah. I’ll give you another hochachah how much sheker is going on. There are two 100% safe medications that help with corona, baduk u’menusah. One of them is Hydroxy-chloroquine, the other one is Ivermectin. The government has fought bitterly to prevent them from being used. They were previously easily accessible medications. Today it’s difficult to get them, because the doctors are afraid to prescribe them. Why? Because they cure corona. Why did they take away the medicines? The answer is that they wanted to push the vaccine. So this is not some conspiracy theory, it’s a metzius. You can see with your eyes what’s happening. Doctors who have spoken up have lost their practices, and they’re being rodef any doctor who wants to speak out about his experience. A doctor puts a short video online telling people to watch out because of his own experience, and it’s taken down within ten minutes. There’s a huge milchamah going on.

 

Aaay the Doctor

 

The problem is that the frumme oilam used to be the savviest, smart, on-the-ball oilam in everything that’s going on in the world. Our oilam, the chareidim, were ahead of everyone else in understanding what’s going on. Now the frumme oilam has become mamash tipshim, they don’t know what’s going on in the world. Their family doctor tells them to take this vaccine, and they take the vaccine. They don’t understand; your family doctor has no ne’emanus on this topic. A doctor called me and asked me; ‘Why are you telling people not to take the vaccine’ I said, ‘Because it’s poison’. He said; ‘Don’t you understand, they made a big chiddush over here.’ I told the doctor; ‘A chiddush, you’re telling me a positive point? You’re going to inject millions of people with a chiddush?!’ I told this doctor; ‘I want to tell you something Doctor; I‘m not calling you a liar, but every single person you’re relying on, all the way up the chain, including Dr Fauci, are lying. They’re all lying. And you’re telling people to take the vaccine?! What are you afraid of that you have to tell people to take the vaccine, of losing your license?’

 

K’chomer B’yad Ha’yotzer

 

The most prestigious medical magazines in the world, The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine, were the most reliable peer reviewed medical journals. They printed articles that were total garbage and lies against Hydroxy-chloroquine. For the first time in history, The Lancet had to retract a previously printed article, ah shandeh v’charpah. Why did they print it? They printed it as part of the propaganda. Now this is the point; it is not necessary for me to convince you, if you do your research you’ll be convinced long before you’re finished. You’ll be horrified long before you’re finished. The only thing I have to tell you is; DO YOUR RESEARCH! Don’t let someone inject you, your father, and your children with some kind of a stuff that you don’t know anything about. Your family doctor has no ne’emanus anymore. You have to do the research yourself. With this so-called vaccine, zul der Eibishter upheeten, there are some people die as soon as they get it. Some people die two weeks later. If they die two weeks later, right away the story is; ‘Oh, who said it was from the vaccine. It’s normal for a twelve year old child to die two weeks later. It’s normal for a forty year old person to die a few weeks later. Who said it has to do with the vaccine.’ Olam hafuch! By COVID if someone died six months later from a traffic accident, it was because of COVID. But if someone got the vaccine and lasted fifteen minutes before he keeled over, they say; ‘Who said it was from the vaccine, maybe it was something else.’ Sheker, sheker, sheker, sheker, sheker.

 

A Well-Grounded Decision?

 

People tell me; I have to take the vaccine because I want to go to Eretz Yisroel. Are you crazy? Is it worth taking a chance with your life to go to Eretz Yisroel? Again; this is not a vaccine, this stuff is terrible, terrible, terrible. What it’s doing to people is o’yom v’norah. And what scares me the most is that there are serious chashashos that some people may not be able to have children after taking this vaccine. It’s nogeiyah right now; women are having very weird, weird kinds of problems that have never been experienced before. Shomer nafshoh yirchak mei’hem. Do not go near this vaccine. Be very, very careful. It’s absolutely forbidden to take this vaccine, assur b’hechlet. Do your research, and you’ll see I’m right. Hashem yishmireinu and the Eibishter should quickly send a refuah shleimah to all the cholei amo Yisroel.

Thursday, September 23, 2021

It was a total pretext!

 “We went to war against a guy who had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. It was a total pretext! It’s inexplicable and there you go to Cheney, there you go to Bush, there you go to the Jewish neo-cons who wanted to remake the world. Maybe I can say that because I’m Jewish ...” Carl Bernstein

Thursday, September 16, 2021

police are watching

Police in Israel boarded an inter-city bus that was riding down a country road and handed out tickets to people they said weren't wearing masks. When they approached a boy who was wearing a mask, they told him they saw him on camera earlier not wearing the mask. In other words, police have access to the camera in the front of the bus that we always assumed was for our protection. (In case there's some violent incident on the bus.) Welcome to 1984. Welcome to the Police State. 


So what do we have? The government creates a bioweapon (this is widely acknowledged) that is let loose on the public, promotes testing via a technique that is not supposed to be used for diagnosis, runs the testing at a magnification rate that is unreliable, pays hospitals to list asymptomatic deaths as COVID deaths, funds accelerated development of an experimental vaccine, eliminates the essential function of tort law for vaccine makers (you cannot sue the vaccine maker), vastly reduces its own oversight on those corporations, lowers its standards for vaccine approval, and then imposes the vaccines on the public. The government also fills society with fear via lockdowns, masks, green passes (an Israeli official admitted this), and propaganda and bans proven therapies for COVID such as Ivermectin and HCQ. Milton Friedman gets smarter every day. The government causes more problems than it solves. With COVID, the government has caused all of the problems. All of them! Where will it end? I don't know where it will end, but I can tell you where it's going. It's going to total tyranny. COVID is the means to do it.

Wednesday, September 15, 2021

wife was slowly murdered at the hospital

 The recording of last night's episode is available at https://rumble.com/vmgplt-r-and-b-medical-war-crimes-8-scott-mantel.html.  It was also posted on America's Frontline Doctors here.

The husband of Deborah Bucko shares the heart-wrenching story of how his wife was slowly murdered at the hospital. Aaron Glatt and the rest of the administration did everything possible to deny her Ivermectin, in defiance of all reason and the positive results before their eyes.

Read more about it at https://chananyaweissman.com/article.php?id=350

Monday, September 13, 2021

Letter from international expert on vaccines and vaccine developer against the COVID shot

 

Open Letter to the WHO: Immediately Halt All Covid-19 Mass Vaccinations

Geert Vanden Bossche, DMV, PhD, independent virologist and vaccine expert, formerly employed at GAVI and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

To all authorities, scientists and experts around the world, to whom this concerns: the entire world population.

I am all but an antivaxxer. As a scientist I do not usually appeal to any platform of this kind to make a stand on vaccine-related topics. As a dedicated virologist and vaccine expert I only make an exception when health authorities allow vaccines to be administered in ways that threaten public health, most certainly when scientific evidence is being ignored.

The present extremely critical situation forces me to spread this emergency call. As the unprecedented extent of human intervention in the Covid-19pandemic is now at risk of resulting in a global catastrophe without equal, this call cannot sound loudly and strongly enough.

As stated, I am not against vaccination. On the contrary, I can assure you that each of the current vaccines have been designed, developed and manufactured by brilliant and competent scientists. However, this type of prophylactic vaccines are completely inappropriate, and even highly dangerous, when used in mass vaccination campaigns during a viral pandemic.

Vaccinologists, scientists and clinicians are blinded by the positive short-term effects in individual patents, but don’t seem to bother about the disastrous consequences for global health. Unless I am scientifically proven wrong, it is difficult to understand how current human interventions will prevent circulating variants from turning into a wild monster.

Racing against the clock, I am completing my scientific manuscript, the publication of which is, unfortunately, likely to come too late given the ever increasing threat from rapidly spreading, highly infectious variants. This is why I decided to already post a summary of my findings as well as my keynote speech at the recent Vaccine Summit in Ohio on LinkedIn.

Last Monday, I provided international health organizations, including the WHO, with my analysis of the current pandemic as based on scientifically informed insights in the immune biology of Covid-19. Given the level of emergency, I urged them to consider my concerns and to initiate a debate on the detrimental consequences of further ‘viral immune escape’.

For those who are no experts in this field, I am attaching below a more accessible and comprehensible version of the science behind this insidious phenomenon.

While there is no time to spare, I have not received any feedback thus far. Experts and politicians have remained silent while obviously still eager to talk about relaxing infection prevention rules and ‘springtime freedom’. My statements are based on nothing else but science. They shall only be contradicted by science.

While one can barely make any incorrect scientific statements without being criticized by peers, it seems like the elite of scientists who are currently advising our world leaders prefer to stay silent. Sufficient scientific evidence has been brought to the table.

Unfortunately, it remains untouched by those who have the power to act. How long can one ignore the problem when there is at present massive evidence that viral immune escape is now threatening humanity? We can hardly say we didn’t know – or were not warned.

In this agonizing letter I put all of my reputation and credibility at stake. I expect from you, guardians of mankind, at least the same. It is of utmost urgency. Do open the debate. By all means: turn the tide!

Why mass vaccination amidst a pandemic creates an irrepressible monster

THE key question is: why does nobody seem to bother about viral immune escape? Let me try to explain this by means of a more easily understood phenomenon: Antimicrobial resistance. One can easily extrapolate this scourge to resistance to our self-made ‘antiviral antibiotics’. Indeed, antibodies (Abs) produced by our own immune system can be considered self-made antiviral antibiotics, regardless of whether they are part of our innate immune system (so-called ‘natural’ Abs’) or elicited in response to specific pathogens (resulting in so-called ‘acquired’ Abs).

Natural Abs are not germ-specific whereas acquired Abs are specifically directed at the invading pathogen. At birth, our innate immune system is ‘unexperienced’ but well-established. It protects us from a multitude of pathogens, thereby preventing these pathogens from causing disease.

As the innate immune system cannot remember the pathogens it encountered (innate immunity has no so-called ‘immunological memory’), we can only continue to rely on it provided we keep it ‘trained’ well enough.

Training is achieved by regular exposure to a myriad of environmental agents, including pathogens. However, as we age, we will increasingly face situations where our innate immunity (often called ‘the first line of immune defense’) is not strong enough to halt the pathogen at the portal of entry (mostly mucosal barriers like respiratory or intestinal epithelia).

When this happens, the immune system has to rely on more specialized effectors of our immune system (i.e., antigen-specific Abs and T cells) to fight the pathogen. So, as we grow up, we increasingly mount pathogen-specific immunity, including highly specific Abs. As those have stronger affinity for the pathogen (e.g., virus) and can reach high concentrations, they can quite easily outcompete our natural Abs for binding to the pathogen/virus.

It is precisely this type of highly specific, high affinity Abs that current Covid-19 vaccines are inducing. Of course, the noble purpose of these Abs is to protect us against Covid-19. So, why then should there be a major concern using these vaccines to fight Covid-19?

Well, similar to the rules applying to classical antimicrobial antibiotics, it is paramount that our self-made ‘antiviral antibiotics’ are made available in sufficient concentration and are tailored at the specific features of our enemy.

This is why in case of bacterial disease it is critical to not only chose the right type of antibiotic (based on the results from an antibiogram) but to also take the antibiotic for long enough (according to the prescription).

Failure to comply with these requirements is at risk of granting microbes a chance to survive and hence, may cause the disease to fare up. A very similar mechanism may also apply to viruses, especially to viruses that can easily and rapidly mutate (which is, for example, the case with Coronaviruses); when the pressure exerted by the army’s (read: population’s) immune defense starts to threaten viral replication and transmission, the virus will take on another coat so that it can no longer be easily recognized and, therefore, attacked by the host immune system. The virus is now able to escape immunity (so-called: ‘immune escape’).

However, the virus can only rely on this strategy provided it still has room enough to replicate. Viruses, in contrast to the majority of bacteria, must rely on living host cells to replicate. This is why the occurrence of ‘escape mutants’ isn’t too worrisome as long as the likelihood for these variants to rapidly find another host is quite remote. However, that’s not particularly the case during a viral pandemic!

During a pandemic, the virus is spreading all over the globe with many subjects shedding and transmitting the virus (even including asymptomatic ‘carriers’). The higher the viral load, the higher the likelihood for the virus to bump into subjects who haven’t been infected yet or who were infected but didn’t develop symptoms. Unless they are sufficiently protected by their innate immune defense (through natural Abs), they will catch Covid-19 disease as they cannot rely on other, i.e., acquired Abs.

It has been extensively reported, indeed, that the increase in S (spike)-specific Abs in asymptomatically infected people is rather limited and only short-lived. Furthermore, these Abs have not achieved full maturity.

The combination of viral infection on a background of suboptimal Ab maturity and concentration enables the virus to select mutations allowing it to escape the immune pressure. The selection of those mutations preferably occurs in the S protein as this is the viral protein that is responsible for viral infectiousness.

As the selected mutations endow the virus with increased infectious capacity, it now becomes much easier for the virus to cause severe disease in infected subjects. The more people develop symptomatic disease, the better the virus can secure its propagation and perpetuation (people who get severe disease will shed more virus and for a longer period of time than asymptomatically infected subjects do).

Unfortunately, enough, the short-lived rise in S-specific Abs does, however, surface to bypass people’s innate/natural Ab. Those are put out of business as their affinity for S is lower than the affinity of S-specific Abs. This is to say that with an increasing rate of infection in the population, the number of subjects who get infected while experiencing a momentary increase in S-specific Abs will steadily increase.

Consequently, the number of subjects who get infected while experiencing a momentary decrease in their innate immunity will increase. As a result, a steadily increasing number of subjects will become more susceptible to getting severe disease instead of showing only mild symptoms (i.e., limited to the upper respiratory tract) or no symptoms at all.

During a pandemic, especially youngsters will be affected by this evolution as their natural Abs are not yet largely suppressed by a panoply of ‘acquired’, antigen-specific Abs. Natural Abs, and natural immunity in general, play a critical role in protecting us from pathogens as they constitute our first line of immune defense. In contrast to acquired immunity, innate immune responses protect against a large spectrum of pathogens (so don’t compromise or sacrifice your innate immune defense!).

Because natural Abs and innate immune cells recognize a diversified spectrum of foreign (i.e., non-self) agents (only some of which have pathogenic potential), it’s important, indeed, to keep it sufficiently exposed to environmental challenges.

By keeping the innate immune system (which, unfortunately, has no memory!) TRAINED, we can much more easily resist germs which have real pathogenic potential. It has, for example, been reported and scientifically proven that exposure to other, quite harmless Coronaviruses causing a ‘common cold ’ can provide protection, although short-lived, against Covid-19 and its loyal henchmen (i.e., the more infectious variants).

Suppression of innate immunity, especially in the younger age groups, can, therefore, become very problematic. There can be no doubt that lack of exposure due to stringent containment measures implemented as of the beginning of the pandemic has not been beneficial to keeping people’s innate immune system well trained.

As if this was not already heavily compromising innate immune defense in this population segment, there comes yet another force into play that will dramatically enhance morbidity and mortality rates in the younger age groups: MASS VACCINATION of the ELDERLY.

The more extensively the later age group will be vaccinated and hence, protected, the more the virus is forced to continue causing disease in younger age groups.

This is only going to be possible provided it escapes to the S-specific Abs that are momentarily raised in previously asymptomatically infected subjects. If the virus manages to do so, it can benefit from the (momentarily) suppressed innate immunity, thereby causing disease in an increasing number of these subjects and ensuring its own propagation.

Selecting targeted mutations in the S protein is, therefore, the way to go in order for the virus to enhance its infectiousness in candidates that are prone to getting the disease because of a transient weakness of their innate immune defense.

But in the meantime, we’re also facing a huge problem in vaccinated people as they’re now more and more confronted with infectious variants displaying a type of S protein that is increasingly different from the S edition comprised with the vaccine (the later edition originates from the original, much less infectious strain at the beginning of the pandemic).

The more variants become infectious (i.e., as a result of blocking access of the virus to the vaccinated segment of the population), the less vaccinal Abs will protect. Already now, lack of protection is leading to viral shedding and transmission in vaccine recipients who are exposed to these more infectious strains (which, by the way, increasingly dominate the field).

This is how we are currently turning vaccines into asymptomatic carriers shedding infectious variants.

At some point, in a likely very near future, it’s going to become more profitable (in term of ‘return on selection investment’) for the virus to just add another few mutations (maybe just one or two) to the S protein of viral variants (already endowed with multiple mutations enhancing infectiousness) in an attempt to further strengthen its binding to the receptor (ACE-2) expressed on the surface of permissive epithelial cells.

This will now allow the new variant to outcompete vaccinal Abs for binding to the ACE receptor. This is to say that at this stage, it would only take very few additional targeted mutations within the viral receptor-binding domain to fully resist S-specific ant-Covid-19 Abs, regardless whether the later are elicited by the vaccine or by natural infection.

At that stage, the virus will, indeed, have managed to gain access to a huge reservoir of subjects who have now become highly susceptible to disease as their S-specific Abs have now become useless in terms of protection but still manage to provide for long-lived suppression of their innate immunity (i.e., natural infection, and especially vaccination, elicit relatively long-lived specific Ab titers). The susceptible reservoir comprises both, vaccinated people and those who’re left with sufficient S-specific Abs due to previous Covid-19 disease).So, MISSION

ACCOMPLISHED for Covid-19 but a DISASTROUS SITUATION for all vaccinated subjects and Covid-19 seropositive people as they’ve now lost both, their acquired and innate immune defense against Covid-19 (while highly infectious strains are circulating!).

That’s ‘one small step for the virus, one giant catastrophe for mankind’, which is to say that we’ll have whipped up the virus in the younger population up to a level that it now takes little effort for Covid-19 to transform into a highly infectious virus that completely ignores both the innate arm of our immune system as well as the adaptive/acquired one (regardless of whether the acquired Abs resulted from vaccination or natural infection).

The effort for the virus is now becoming even more negligible given that many vaccine recipients are now exposed to highly infectious viral variants while having received only a single shot of the vaccine.

Hence, they are endowed with Abs that have not yet acquired optimal functionality. There is no need to explain that this is just going to further enhance immune escape. Basically, we’ll very soon be confronted with a super-infectious virus that completely resists our most precious defense mechanism: The human immune system.

From all of the above, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to imagine how the consequences of the extensive and erroneous human intervention in this pandemic are not going to wipe out large parts of our human population.

One could only think of very few other strategies to achieve the same level of efficiency in turning a relatively harmless virus into a bioweapon of mass destruction.

It’s certainly also worth mentioning that mutations in the S protein (i.e., exactly the same protein that is subject to selection of escape mutations) are known to enable Coronaviruses to cross species barriers.

This is to say that the risk that vaccine-mediated immune escape could allow the virus to jump to other animal species, especially industrial livestock (e.g., pig and poultry farms), is not negligible. These species are already known to host several different Coronaviruses and are usually housed in farms with high stocking density.

Similar to the situation with influenza virus, these species could than serve as an additional reservoir for SARS-COVID-2 virus.

As pathogens have co-evolved with the host immune system, natural pandemics of acute self-limiting viral infections have been shaped such as to take a toll on human lives that is not higher than strictly required.

Due to human intervention, the course of this pandemic has been thoroughly disturbed as of the very beginning. Widespread and stringent infection prevention measures combined with mass vaccination campaigns using inadequate vaccines will undoubtedly lead to a situation where the pandemic is getting increasingly ‘out of control’.

Paradoxically, the only intervention that could offer a perspective to end this pandemic (other than to let it run its disastrous course) is …VACCINATION. Of course, the type of vaccines to be used would be completely different of conventional vaccines in that they’re not inducing the usual suspects, i.e., B and T cells, but NK cells.

There is, indeed, compelling scientific evidence that these cells play a key role in facilitating complete elimination of Covid-19 at an early stage of infection in asymptomatically infected subjects.

NK cells are part of the cellular arm of our innate immune system and, alike natural Abs, they are capable of recognizing and attacking a broad and diversified spectrum of pathogenic agents.

There is a sound scientific rationale to assume that it is possible to ‘prime’ NK cells in ways for them to recognize and kill Coronaviruses at large (include all their variants) at an early stage of infection. NK cells have increasingly been described to be endowed with the capacity to acquire immunological memory.

By educating these cells in ways that enable them to durably recognize and target Coronavirus-infected cells, our immune system could be perfectly armed for a targeted attack to the universe of Coronaviruses prior to exposure.

As NK cell-based immune defense provides sterilizing immunity and allows for broad-spectrum and fast protection, it is reasonable to assume that harnessing our innate immune cells is going to be the only type of human intervention left to halt the dangerous spread of highly infectious Covid-19 variants.

If we, human beings, are committed to perpetuating our species, we have no choice left but to eradicate these highly infectious viral variants. This will, indeed, require large vaccination campaigns. However, NK cell-based vaccines will primarily enable our natural immunity to be better prepared (memory!) and to induce herd immunity (which is exactly the opposite of what current Covid-19 vaccines do as those increasingly turn vaccine recipients into asymptomatic carriers who are shedding virus).

So, there is not one second left for gears to be switched and to replace the current killer vaccines by life-saving vaccines.

I am appealing to the WHO and all stakeholders involved, no matter their conviction, to immediately declare such action as THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY OF INTERNATIONAL CONCERN.



In sum, Dr. Vanden Bossche is saying that the COVID shot destroys the innate immune system and creates variants that will attack it.
Vanden Bossche received his DVM from the University of Ghent, Belgium, and his PhD degree in Virology from the University of Hohenheim, Germany. He held adjunct faculty appointments at universities in Belgium and Germany. After his career in Academia, Geert joined several vaccine companies (GSK Biologicals, Novartis Vaccines, Solvay Biologicals) to serve various roles in vaccine R&D as well as in late vaccine development. Geert then moved on to join the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s GH Discovery team as SPO and later on to work with GAVI as Senior Ebola Program Manager; he subsequently joined the German Center for Infection Research as Head of the Vaccine Development Office.