Tuesday, August 31, 2021

Hello. My name is Dr. Christina Parks

 Hello. My name is Dr. Christina Parks,

I received my PhD in cellular and molecular biology right here in the state of Michigan from University of Michigan Medical School, and so I’m very well versed in the science of both these mRNA gene therapy vaccines, this kind of technology, as well as what a vaccine is designed to do in the body, what it can do, what it can’t do, and the fact that this is extremely complex science that has been oversimplified in the media to basically take away our freedom of choice.

What I want to address today in this limited time is the fact that vaccine requirements and mandates are based on the faulty assumption that the vaccines in question prevent transmission of the pathogen. Right? Does the vaccine for DTAP prevent transmission? No. Does the vaccine for flu prevent transmission? No. Do the vaccines for covid prevent transmission? No. In fact, they were never designed to do that.

All right, so you’re asking, ‘What about this 95 effectiveness?’ If you look at those clinical trials, they do not say that they prevent transmission; they expressly say that they’re measuring whether they attenuate symptoms. So they’re 95 percent effective based on their clinical trials at attenuating symptoms for the first variant, which is essentially gone in our population.

Right? Now the predominant variant is the Delta and CDC Director Walensky basically said that these vaccines have no ability to prevent infection by and transmission of the Delta variant.

So our policy needs not to be built on the hope of what we think something we want it to do, but what the data actually tell us. So do these…vaccines prevent the virus from infecting and replicating in the nose and nasopharynx? No. They’ve only been shown to prevent that replication in the lungs. They’re different — the mucosa is very different than the lungs. It’s very different than the blood. You inject it to the blood, you make antibodies in your blood. The virus isn’t infecting your blood, it’s infecting your mucosa and you don’t produce any IGA to neutralize it.

In fact, recent studies have shown that the vaccinated, especially with the Delta variant, and the unvaccinated have similar amounts of virus in their nose and throat.

In Barnstable, Massachusetts, the CDC tracked an outbreak of 469 cases of Covid, 74 percent occurred in fully-vaccinated and 4 out of five of those hospitalized were vaccinated.

Right, so maybe they are mandating this because they just didn’t know with the Covid…and so my main complaint is with our health agencies and the CDC who basically know better and are misleading the public.

So, let’s look at DTAP which the scientists in the CDC have known since 2014 that the acellular pertussis vaccine does not prevent people from getting infected with the pertussis bacteria and passing it to others.

In fact, it was never designed to do that. The vaccine was designed to neutralize the pertussis toxin. Pertussis, we know it as whooping cough; it can be fatal for children under six months, so neutralizing this toxin saves lives. All right?

I’m not going to debate that, but what it doesn’t do is neutralize the bacteria. So what happens is fully-vaccinated children go to daycare, they pick up that bacteria, and they come home, and they give it to their newborn brother, or sister, they get deathly ill and they go to the hospital. Hopefully our medical professionals are able to save them, but who do they blame? Now the CDC is blaming anti-vaxxers for the limitations of this vaccine design.

I suggest that they be transparent and tell parents that, although it is preventing severe disease in their children, it is not preventing transmission because we have created a whole class of asymptomatic pertussis carriers who are increasing the disease.

Now, the old DTP vaccine that many of you who are my age or older got, did prevent transmission. When we switched to the safer acellular version they knew that it was never designed to prevent transmission. It was safer, it had less adverse advance, but pertussis cases have gone through the roof. There’s a resurgence in pertussis because of the design of the vaccine and the vaccinologists know this. They’re trying to address it, and so we cannot mandate that something that does not prevent transmission.

What about the flu vaccine? Well, they have shown that basically there’s no difference, there’s no statistical difference if you’re vaccinated, or unvaccinated whether you get the flu or not — but it’s even worse, because although that first year it is somewhat effective, it’s about 65 percent effective at preventing symptoms in you, after that it actually has negative efficacy, and I want to address this because it’s very important.

Vaccines are made to a specific variant and when that variant mutates the vaccine no longer recognizes it, and so it’s like you’re seeing a completely new virus, and because that’s so you actually get more severe symptoms when you’re vaccinated against one variant and then it mutates and then your body sees the other variant; so there’s the potential, and the science shows, that in fact with the flu, if you get vaccinated in multiple years you are more likely to get severe disease, you are more likely to have more viral replication, and you are more likely to be hospitalized, both in adults and in children.

We are seeing the same thing in Covid with the Delta variant, and so we are mandating that people get a vaccine that could actually make them more sick when they’re exposed to the virus.

In fact, this week a paper came out and what it showed is that with this Delta variant when you’re vaccinated your body makes antibodies that are supposed to neutralize the virus, but they were supposed to neutralize the old variant. When they see this new variant what they’re doing is they’re actually…the antibodies are taking the virus and helping it infect the cells. All right?

That science was just published this week. We need to be looking at the science, and we need our policy to reflect the science, and we also need it to reflect our rights.

And so, as a PHd who knows the science, I’m in the category of the most vaccine hesitant group.

Yes, PHd’s are the most vaccine hesitant, followed by people who have less than a high school degree because they know what they don’t know and they don’t trust their government and many people, the other group that is very vaccine hesitant are African-Americans. 70 percent of African Americans have not taken this vaccine. Why? Because they don’t trust their government.

Do they have reason not to trust their government?

Well, between the years of 1930 in 1970 the CDC conducted the Tuskegee experiment where they took untreated males with syphilis and they refused to treat them. Even after antibiotics became available, they still did not treat them and they did not tell them that they had syphilis. They told those people that they were there to secure their health and they did not secure their health. They abused them. You say, ‘Well that was in the past,’ although I don’t think 1970 was that long ago.

While in 2012, whistleblower William Thompson came forward and said we published a study that said MMR does not cause autism, but we lied.

In fact, we shredded data that showed that when black boys are vaccinated on time they have increased rates of autism diagnosis, and we shredded it and we left it out of the paper.

As an African-American and a PHd, I want to ask each of you: are we going to exclude 70 percent of African-American people from the workforce and from education? My ancestors did not work this hard — I come up from a family that worked very hard and I’m very aware that my privileges are dependent on the work of my grandmother and my great-grandmother and I have great respect for these people that put me where I am, and yet you’re telling me that my son will not be able to be educated if, based on the history of African Americans in this country, that he doesn’t want to be vaccinated?

So I will leave you with that question: who are we going to exclude from the workforce? Are we going to continue with discrimination and segregation in the United States of America?

Thank you.

https://youtu.be/8DOOZpGA_VI

https://www.bitchute.com/video/3PhStqLJfvQK/

Thursday, August 19, 2021

The deception of the liberal press

 Headline:

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, who opposes vaccine and mask mandates, tests positive for COVID-19



Now read further:

Abbott is asymptomatic and has already been vaccinated. Abbott had reportedly told others that he had received a booster shot, NBC News reported.

Wednesday, August 18, 2021

Another COVID vaccine death

Just came back from a shiva (Jewish wake). 76 year old man in good health died from blood clots. Yes, he had been vaccinated. 

Sunday, August 15, 2021

Tehillim 106:19

Psalms 106:19

They made a calf in Horeb and prostrated themselves to a molten image.

The Hebrew is as follows:

יַֽעֲשׂוּ־עֵ֥גֶל בְּחֹרֵ֑ב וַ֜יִּֽשְׁתַּֽחֲו֗וּ לְמַסֵּכָֽה

The last word - molten image - is the same word in Hebrew for mask: Masecha.

Assassination in Israel




Israeli Education Minister Yifat Shasha-Biton opposes vaccinating children in schools and in general has been the voice of restraint about COVID policy. Yesterday, a senior adviser to her was murdered in Northern Israel. A threat?

Thursday, August 12, 2021

Who is fact checking the fact checkers?

VIDEO: Doctor Takes Over Mic At School Board Meeting And Stuns Entire Room

Dr. Dan Stock of Indiana spoke before a school board, arguing against masks, green passes, and lockdowns. He gave good arguments, full of interesting facts. His words certainly deserve attention and an informed response. The video went viral as they say, but youtube removed it for violating terms of service. What is the term of service? That you have to agree with the CDC, which means you have to agree with the government. That my friend is tyranny. And the CDC has a revolving door with big pharma, so it's tyranny by corporations which don't get their power from even corrupt elections. It's fascism. 

The USA Today (and the other usual suspects) claims to debunk his claims but doesn't use any facts really. Just says, his words are full of misinformation. They just assert that. They don't show it. You can tell it isn't even the USA Today attempting the debunking. It's a hired service, probably with some medical school dropouts or flunky doctors. You can tell in part because they give him a little respect since he is an MD. They aren't going to totally dis one of their own. You can tell also because they use all the practiced tricks, like assertions of debunking without any argument or fact, vague cliched quotes from what seem like unimpeachable sources like Medical School deans who are the most corrupted people on earth, expressions of exasperation over "this type of misinformation," repeated use of the word misinformation, and of course personal attacks, such as saying that his archived web page calls for vitamins or that he may be an MD but he isn't board certified. I don't know why using vitamins is a criticism, but if you say it with derision people tend to go along with the derision. The one fact in the whole article was that the unvaxxed comprised 90 something percent of the 'cases' in Indiana. So we have this:

Dr. Harvey Risch of the Yale School of Medicine recently called out the CDC for widespread medical fraud in an interview with Fox New’s Laura Ingraham. The CDC modified the COVID-19 testing parameters for the wholly vaccinated, cutting the cycle threshold count of the PCR test ONLY for the vaccinated. According to Dr. Harvey Risch, “Some months ago, the CDC stopped counting breakthrough cases,” he explained, “the large numbers of cases in people who had been vaccinated.” “So, of course, those cases don’t register for the CDC’s counts, and so the great proportion [of cases] that they’re claiming are in unvaccinated people.”

If the USA Today article were balanced, they would mention this. The article is as full of misinformation as anything they claim to be debunking. As for the doctor's claim that he has treated people successfully with zinc and the like, the article says, this treatment has not been approved by the CDC. That's their refutation. End of subject. Again, it's all about the CDC. That's tyranny. That's Soviet Russia that the government decides everything. Meanwhile 1000s of doctors have talked about their success with the Zelenko protocol and over 50 studies say that hydroxochloroquine works. If the article were debunking in an informed way, it would mention these doctors and these studies.

The article talks about how the doctor sounds professional so you believe his misinformation. The same can be said for the article. It takes this journalistic tone but it is a hack job. It's not factual, not balanced. It's propaganda. 

So who's checking the checkers?

Wednesday, August 11, 2021

these rabbis issued public statements exhorting Jews not to take the injection

 The following rabbis issued public statements exhorting Jews not to take the injection:


Rabbi Aharon Reisner, Bnei Brak

Rabbi Aharon Yitzchak Stern

Rabbi Ahron Raz, Jerusalem[1]

Rabbi Alon Anava


Rabbi Amnon Yitzchak


Rabbi Amos Gweta


Rabbi Arel Segal Halevi

Rabbi Arie Pressman, Taganrog, Russia


Rabbi Asher Mordechai Rubin


Rabbi Avraham Pinchas Koritz, Bnei Brak


Rabbi Avraham Rachamim Sofer, Lakewood, NJ


Rabbi Avraham Yosef Zaide, Beitar[2]


Rabbi Avraham Cohen, Jerusalem[3]


Rabbi Avrohom Simcha Chanun, Jerusalem[4]


Rabbi Avrohom Yehoshua Soloveitchik

Rabbi Bentzion Biaron, Senior Dayan, Jerusalem

Rabbi Chaim Rabinowitz, Rebbe, Jerusalem[5]


Rabbi Chaim Zev Shneider, Mir Yeshiva, Jerusalem

Rabbi Chananya Weissman, Jerusalem

Rabbi Daniel Asor

Rabbi Daniel Green, Brooklyn, NY

Rabbi Dov Berkowitz

Rabbi Dov Gross, Dayan of Gur, Ashdod

Rabbi Dov Meir Stein

Rabbi Dovid Meir Shmueli

Rabbi Dovid Michoel Shmidel, Bnei Brak

Rabbi Eliyahu Brog, Flatbush, NY[6]

Rabbi Eliyahu Brog, Brooklyn, NY

Rabbi Gideon Charlap

Rabbi Hillel Handler, Brooklyn, NY

Rabbi Meir Chakak Halevi

Rabbi Meir Eliyahu

Rabbi Meiri Chananel

Rabbi Menachem Edri

Rabbi Menachem Mendel Sabowitz, Beit Shemesh[7]

Rabbi Menashe Amon

Rabbi Michoel Green, Westborough, MA

Rabbi Mordechai Vizhnitzer, Dayan of Vizhnitz, Ashdod

Rabbi Moshe Mordechai Karp, Kiryat Sefer

Rabbi Moshe Zev Zorger, Jerusalem[8]

Rabbi Naftoli Tzvi Rotenburg, Kossoner Rebbe, Beit Shemesh

Rabbi Natan Kofsitz, Eidah Hachareidis, Beit Shemesh

Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, Chazon Yaakov, Jerusalem[9]

Rabbi Reuven Marzbach, Jerusalem[10]

Rabbi Shimon Chyrek, Brooklyn, NY

Rabbi Shimon Nebenzhal, Bnei Brak                           

Rabbi Shimon Shapiro, Jerusalem[11]

Rabbi Shlomo Pollack, Lakewood, NJ[12]


Rabbi Shlomo Yitzchok Stern, Bnei Brak


Rabbi Shmuel Eliezer Stern, Bnei Brak


Rabbi Shneur Friedman, Rechovot


Rabbi Sholom Kamenetsky, Philadelphia[13]


Rabbi Simcha Yisroel Bloom


Rabbi Smilowitz, Kremintzer Rov, Brooklyn, NY


Rabbi Tuvia Shulzinger, Kiryat Atta

Rabbi Tzvi Aryeh Zorger, Dayan, Jerusalem[14]

Rabbi Tzvi Friedman, Av Beis Din, Masores, Bnei Brak

Rabbi Tzvi Greenhaus, Bnei Brak

Rabbi Uri Michoel Sofer, Dayan

Rabbi Yaakov Cohen, Lakewood, NJ

Rabbi Yechiel Michel Friedman, Bnei Brak


Rabbi Yehoshua Atik, Jerusalem[15]

Rabbi Yehoshua Finkelstein, Lakewood, NJ

Rabbi Yekutiel Ohab-tzion, Tiberius

Rabbi Yeshaya Rottenburg, Rozla Rebbe, Beitar

Rabbi Yeshua Asher Rabinowitz[16]

Rabbi Yinon Malachi, Elad

Rabbi Yitzchok David Smith, Passaic, NJ

Rabbi Yoav Alon, Rechovot

Rabbi Yoel Moshe Friedman, Dayan, Monsey, NY

Rabbi Yonoson Hahn

Rabbi Yosef Berger

Rabbi Yosef Binyamin Wosner, Zichron Meir, Bnei Brak

Rabbi Yosef Dovid Teitelbaum, Sassover Rebbe, Bnei Brak

Rabbi Yosef Mordechai Salamon, Bnei Brak

Rabbi Yosef Mozes, Kroli Rav

Rabbi Yosef Zalman Bloch, Monsey, NY

Rabbi Yuval Asherov Hakohen

Rabbi Yuval Ovadia


The following rabbis instructed individuals not to the take the vaccine:


Rabbi Aharon Feinhandler, Jerusalem

Rabbi Aharon Shuv, Jerusalem

Rabbi Aryeh Malkiel Kotler, Rosh Yeshiva, Lakewood

Rabbi Avika Rabinowitz, Rebbe, Porisov

Rabbi Avrohom Elimelech Biderman, Bnei Brak

Rabbi Bentzion Halberstam, Lakewood, NJ

Rabbi Biderman, Rebbe of Lelov Nicholsburg

Rabbi Binyamin Halpern, Lakewood

Rabbi Dov Kook, Tiberius

Rabbi Dovid Biderman, Lelover Rebbe, Boro Park, NY

Rabbi Dovid Kohn, Rebbe, Toldos Aharon

Rabbi Dovid Twersky, Rebbe, Rachmastrivka

Rabbi Eldad Shmueli

Rabbi Eliezer Ginsburg, Rosh Kolel Mir, Flatbush, NY

Rabbi Eliyahu Shiri

Rabbi Elya Ber Wachtfogel, South Fallsburg, NY

Rabbi Ezra Zafrani, Lakewood, NJ

Rabbi Feivish Hager, Kossover Rebbe, Boro Park, NY

Rabbi Landau, Rebbe, Strikov, Bnei Brak

Rabbi Milikowsky, Rebbe, Amshinov, Jerusalem

Rabbi Mordechai Gottlieb

Rabbi Mordeci Sheinberger

Rabbi Moshe Shinom Wosner, Lakewood, NJ

Rabbi Moshe Shternbuch

Rabbi Moshe Tzadka, Rosh Yeshiva Porat Yosef, Yeruslayim

Rabbi Nachman Biderman, Jerusalem

Rabbi Noson Zeigelbaum, Dayan, Vien, Boro Park, NY

Rabbi Pinchas Eliyahu Shadday, Rosh Yeshiva, Jerusalem[17]

Rabbi Pinchas Shuv[18]

Rabbi Rabinowitz, Rebbe, Biala, Bnei Brak

Rabbi Raphael Szmerla, Lakewood

Rabbi Ravid Nagar

Rabbi Rebbe, Pinsk Karlin, Jerusalem

Rabbi Roth, Rebbe, Shomrei Emunim

Rabbi Shalom Arush, Jerusalem

Rabbi Shmuel Kamenetsky, Rosh Yeshiva, Philadelphia

Rabbi Shmuel Meir Katz, Lakewood

Rabbi Shmuel Yaakov Kohn, Rebbe, Toldos Avrohom Yitzchok

Rabbi Tzion Buganim

Rabbi Yaakov Meir Shechter, Breslov, Jersusalem[19]

Rabbi Yakov Adas, Jerusalem

Rabbi Yakov Shiknazi

Rabbi Yehuda Sheinfeld, Jerusalem

Rabbi Yisroel Reisman, Lakewood, NJ

Rabbi Yitzchak Kohen, Yeruhalayim

Rabbi Yosef Asyag

Rabbi Yosef Dovid Teitelbaum, Rebbe, Sassov, Bnei Brak

Rabbi Yosef Tzvi, Dushinsky, Rebbe, Jerusalem[20]

Rabbi Zemba, Lakewood, NJ

Rabbi Zev Epstein, South Fallsburg, NY

Vizhnitzer Rebbe of Monsey


Three Lessons from Shoftim

 

Three Lessons from Shoftim

1. Mari bar Issak was a wealthy, powerful man who was known to intimidate people. One time a long-lost brother showed up from another land and requested half of their father's inheritance. Mari said he did not know him. They came before Rav Chisda, who instructed the claimant to produce witnesses that he was Mari's brother.

“I have witnesses,” said the man, “but they are afraid of him, for he is a tough guy.”

Rav Chisda turned to Mari. “You go and bring witnesses that he is not your brother.”

“Is that the law?” retorted Mari. “One who claims money from his fellow must bring the proof.”

“That is how I judge you and your fellow gangsters,” replied Rav Chisda. Ultimately witnesses came forward and testified that the man was indeed his brother. (See Bava Metzia 39B.)

This source is codified in Jewish law.

The Zera Shimshon finds an allusion to it in the first pasuk of this week's parsha. The Torah states “ושפטו את העם משפט צדק” – "and they shall judge the people with righteous judgment” (Devarim 16:18). The words “את העם” appear superfluous.

The Zera Shimshon cites the incident with Mari bar Issak, when Rav Chisda went against the usual law precisely so a righteous judgment could come to light. He adds that “העם” typically refers to gangsters and lowlifes. The Torah is hinting that they are judged differently than other people. The burden of proof is always on them; even if they are the defendant in monetary matters, they are guilty until proven innocent.

One doesn't need to be a Talmudic sage to apply this law to our current situation. Those who are trying to force us to take toxic injections and engage in other forms of self-harm are gangsters. The politicians, bureaucrats, media, and “social influencers” are all unsavory, untrustworthy people – often far worse. The powerful companies who pull their strings have a long history of corruption, racketeering, and every crime against humanity under the sun. Their trail of blood is staggering beyond comprehension.

We're supposed to believe their numbers, and their studies, and their assurances? We're supposed to accept their testimony about anything at all?

Not according to the Torah.

If they want us to believe anything they say, they must produce incontrovertible evidence. Studies they pay for, which are conducted by people they own, published in journals they sponsor, broadcast in media they control, “fact-checked” by liars they employ, promoted by bureaucrats in their pocket, have zero value as evidence.

In addition, known liars and lowlifes are ineligible to testify according to Jewish law, not to mention anyone with a vested interest. Anyone who is connected to the world's largest organized crime syndicate – otherwise known as the government, pharmaceutical industry, and global companies – is ineligible to testify that their products are “safe and effective”. Not surprisingly, those pushing the injections and supporting tyranny are almost invariably connected to the syndicate in some way (or wish to be, or admire it).

The burden of evidence is squarely on them, and the normal rules do not apply; they are guilty until proven innocent, and we must be leery of everything they say.

As Rav Chisda said, that is how we judge them and their fellow gangsters.

* * *

2. Many Jews have been swayed by orders from corrupt rabbis to take needless, toxic injections. Those of us who have been battling these false prophets often hear about the instruction from this week's parsha to follow the judges of our time in all that they instruct us, even if they tell us that left is right and right is left (Devarim 17:8-11).

It should be self-understood that this instruction does not apply to rulings that violate the Torah. The Torah makes it abundantly clear that no one, not even a prophet, has the authority to overrule the Torah. The Torah forbids people to endanger their lives with needless, dangerous drugs, irrespective of how much authority figures and their propaganda machine demand otherwise. If a drug is dangerous, a rabbi cannot make it safe by declaring it so. He is not God, nor does God bend to his words.

The context of this section also makes it clear that it is referring to rulings that clarify ordinary cases of doubt, such as matters of purity and monetary judgments. Even if someone believes the court got it wrong – which is common for those who receive an unfavorable ruling – he must accept the ruling of the court. This section does not apply to imposing medical interventions on the entire Jewish nation.

In addition, this law only applies to the Sanhedrin, not contemporary rabbis who instruct people to gamble their lives on the integrity of godless, corrupt “experts”. These rabbis have no power to declare that left is right, nor even that right is right. They have discredited themselves. And even the Sanhedrin cannot change permit the forbidden.

Here is a nice hint to all the above. The Torah states in pesukim 10-11:

ועשית על פי הדבר אשר יגידו לך מן המקום ההוא אשר יבחר הושמרת לעשות ככל אשר יורוךעל פי התורה אשר יורוך ועל המשפט אשר יאמרו לך תעשה לא תסור מן הדבר אשר יגידו לך ימין ושמאל

The beginning of pasuk 11, “על פי התורה אשר יורוך ועל המשפט אשר יאמרו לך תעשה”, seems redundant. The Torah is hinting that we must do “like all they instruct us” only if it is “על פי התורה”, according to the Torah.

Maybe this is a chassidishe vort – it's my own chiddush – but the lesson is true.

* * *

3. No chiddush here, just an important reminder.

Devarim 18:13 reads: תמים תהיה עם האלהיך

“You shall be complete with Hashem your God.”

Rashi explains:

התהלך עמו בתמימות ותצפה לו ולא תחקור אחר העתידותאלא כל מה שיבוא עליך קבל בתמימות ואז תהיה עמו ולחלקו

“Go with Him with innocence [complete, simple faith] and look toward Him, and do not delve into trying to determine the future. Rather, whatever comes upon you, accept with innocence, and then you will be His nation and for His portion.”

Keep it simple and let God run the world.

__________________________

https://chananyaweissman.com/

https://rumble.com/c/c-782463

If you received this from someone else and want to receive future articles directly, please send a request to endthemadness@gmail.com.

Tuesday, August 10, 2021

most new cases among the vaccinated

Of the 6,275 new cases reported Monday, 44.3% were unvaccinated, compared to 54% who were fully vaccinated, and 1.7% who had received one dose of the vaccine.

Among seriously ill patients, 36% are not vaccinated, compared to 61% who are fully vaccinated and 3% who received one dose of the vaccine.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/311467

Monday, August 9, 2021

Compare and contrast

 



Governor Kristi Noem is a wife, a mother, and a lifelong rancher, farmer and small business owner.

In 2010, after serving in the South Dakota legislature for several years, Noem was elected to serve as South Dakota's lone member of the U.S. House of Representatives. During her time in Congress, in addition to many other successes, Governor Noem helped pass the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which put $2,400 back in the pockets of the average South Dakota family.

In 2018, with the platform of protecting South Dakotans against tax increases, government growth, federal intrusion, and government secrecy, she was elected as South Dakota's first-ever female Governor.

As Governor, Noem has respected the rights of her people by trusting them to exercise their personal responsibility to make the best decisions for themselves, their loved-ones, and – in turn – their communities. This approach has been most evident in her response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Governor Noem never ordered a single business or church to close and never issued a statewide shelter-in-place order.

Despite all of this, Governor Noem often says that her greatest accomplishment is raising her three children, Kassidy, Kennedy, and Booker, with her husband Bryon. All have a deep love for their family and an even deeper love for the Lord.

----------------------

And then over in Israel, the alleged Jewish state:

List of atheists in politics and law

Middle East


The demagogue's defense that Netanyahu and Trump share: It ...

Netanyahu, the avowed atheist, now calls on God to help and defend him. But until that divine sign of favor is revealed, he's going to use his bully pulpit to attack the rule of law - and the basic intelligence of every Israeli. Don Futterman. Feb. 14, 2018.


The former defense minister A. Lieberman said he will not allow Israel to become an halachic state. "We are in favor of a Jewish state, we are against a halachic state," he said. "Israeli law cannot be Torah law," he saidThe former Prime Minster, the man who claims to represent world Jewry, just said the same thing as the Defense Minister. "The State of Israel will not be a halachic state," he said. 


The Knesset's Constitution, Law, and Justice Committee on Monday met to discuss the expanded Green Pass guidelines, which went into force on Sunday.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/311414

Watch: Man refuses to wear a mask - and is arrested

Man who refused to don mask in an enclosed mall is handcuffed and dragged out, as his wife looks on.